- From: Peter Parslow via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 06:24:28 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
Two other points on this, Rob. TC 211's Geolexica is already authoritative as a terminology register. What we (well, some of us) are trying to achieve is the inversion from having the document / words / terms as normative, to having the concept as the core matter, with terms, UML classes, OWL classes as representations of the concepts. In my view, this can work at may levels - conceptual, logical, physical (to adopt for now that terminology). It would be good to work with W3C & OGC on this, but we are also working with others in ISO (through the "[ISO SMART](https://www.iso.org/smart)" project) in this direction. In this case, "SMART" stands for something like "standards (that are) machine-readable/interpretable, accessible, reusable, translatable" - i.e. not PDF files with pictures in :). The TC211 Multi-lingual glossary published at GeoLexica has been accepted as a good exemplar of the direction they want to go. -- GitHub Notification of comment by PeterParslow Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1372#issuecomment-1274144662 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2022 06:24:30 UTC