- From: Peter Parslow via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 02:23:46 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
I get the point that ISO 19156 is the normative thing. My understanding of what we are trying to achieve in ISO/TC 211, as one of the candidate "ISO SMART" projects is to abstract normative concepts from existing standards and make those normative - with the UML class then being one realization (or whatever you want to call it) of the concept. A SKOS serialisation would be another. I'm not actually certain that that is how Kathie sees it in her ongoing revision of ISO 19156 - one for discussion. Then there's the question of what the relationship is between the concepts at OGC/W3C and ISO, and the various representations of those concepts. I agree that the existing owl:sameAs and rdfs:seeAlso don't seem to capture them. -- GitHub Notification of comment by PeterParslow Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1372#issuecomment-1274001713 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2022 02:23:48 UTC