- From: Peter Parslow via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 13:19:33 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
The UK's Geospatial Commission's case is that data needs to be "Q" (fit for some purpose?) before there's much point in making it findable or reusable. https://geospatialcommission.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/25/byte-ing-back-better-introducing-a-q-fair-approach-to-geospatial-data-improvement/ I am aware of counter arguments - one sector of UK's open data community pushed for people to put whatever data they had 'out there' with the hope/expectation that users would provide quality improvements. However, I do remember a similar challenge being made to TBL's "five stars" of (linked) open data - that they said nothing about data quality. -- GitHub Notification of comment by PeterParslow Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1290#issuecomment-1009957422 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2022 13:19:34 UTC