- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 05:10:16 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
Hmmm. Since ``` ex:EventA time:hasTime ex:TimeEntityB . ``` is logically equivalent to ``` ex:TimeEntityB time:timePertainsTo ex:EventA . ``` Can't you just mint the former? These days I'm a little wary of creating inverse properties since then you have a synching challenge - if there are two ways to express the same assertion, then what if they are inconsistent? And in this case, since the cardinality of `time:timePertainsTo` relations are potentially large, then `time:hasTime` would generally be easier to manage. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1337#issuecomment-1047430989 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2022 05:10:18 UTC