- From: Peter Parslow via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 08:46:49 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
@KoalaGeo : that looks like a useful general document to cite; could you propose it (as a pull request) at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/1333? @rob-metalinkage : I'm not sure I see the connection between giving a good description of structure, semantics, etc, and "quality" (except I guess in a very general sense - the data isn't much use without the semantics being explained). "quality" here is surely a mix of quantitative (stuff like 'how much of the data do we believe to be correct / accurate / ....' & why do we believe that) and sometimes just qualitative. It's the latter where 'purpose' becomes relevant: 'good enough for what'. If the publisher doesn't know what their purpose is in having/publishing the data, then it would be pretty hard for them to say anything about it. -- GitHub Notification of comment by PeterParslow Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1290#issuecomment-1038810147 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 14 February 2022 08:46:51 UTC