- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 07:58:26 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
> Is a new relationship class warranted? Maybe. I can imagine many many different potential relationship types. In DCAT we managed this with a specific [dcat:Relationship class](https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/#Class:Relationship), which is annotated with [dcat:hadRole](https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/#Property:relationship_hadRole) whose value would be taken from a (controlled?) vocabulary - also see the [extended explanation](https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/#UML-DCAT-Qualified-Relations). This pattern would probably work, right? DCAT is primarily concerned with datasets, though this structure is tied to the general `dcat:Resource` which is 'any catalogued thing'. So it could be re-used directly, but since SSN/SOSA doesn't use anything else from the DCAT namespace, it might be better to add it natively (and maybe declare some kind of equivalence). This probably merits a new issue. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1282#issuecomment-942031355 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2021 07:58:28 UTC