- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 01:58:46 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
@mathib you can define the observable property any way you like, as long as your community understands what you are doing. Your use-case is common, and it is very common to see units bound to properties in catalogues of observable-properties in just the way you propose. If you want to use predicates and values from QUDT, however, I would strongly recommend using them from the current (unversioned) namespace - i.e. - schema elements from http://qudt.org/schema/qudt/ such as this http://qudt.org/schema/qudt/unit - individuals from http://qudt.org/vocab/unit/ such as http://qudt.org/vocab/unit/M These all dereference properly. QUDT is in version 2.1 - version 2 is several years old now - see http://www.qudt.org/ -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1267#issuecomment-858220795 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2021 01:59:07 UTC