Wednesday, 28 July 2021
- Re: [sdw] Best Practice 12 - Convenience APIs (#1237)
- Re: [sdw] [Responsible use] Feedback Re: abstract (#1276)
- Re: [sdw] [Responsible use] Feedback Re: context (#1277)
- Re: [sdw] [Responsible use] Feedback Re: spatial is special (#1281)
- Re: [sdw] [Responsible use] Feedback Re: spatial is special (#1281)
- [sdw] [Responsible use] Feedback Re: spatial is special (#1281)
- [sdw] [Responsible use] Feedback Re: data ethics (#1280)
- [sdw] [Responsible use] Feedback Re: data ethics (#1279)
- [sdw] [Responsible use] Feedback Re: data ethics (#1278)
- [sdw] [Responsible use] Feedback Re: context (#1277)
- [sdw] [Responsible use] Feedback Re: abstract (#1276)
- [sdw] [Responsible use] Feedback Re: abstract (#1275)
- [sdw] [Responsible use] Feedback from "Regulator breakout" AAG event (#1274)
- [sdw] WebVMT & MapML: Shared goals (#1273)
Friday, 23 July 2021
- RE: We need your brains and expertise: SDW 2022 - where next to drive impact from geospatial data?
- [sdw] new commits pushed by lvdbrink
- [sdw] new commits pushed by lvdbrink
Thursday, 22 July 2021
- RE: We need your brains and expertise: SDW 2022 - where next to drive impact from geospatial data?
- Re: [sdw] Discussion thread for "Spatial Data on the Web 2022 – where next to drive impact from geospatial data" (#1271)
- We need your brains and expertise: SDW 2022 - where next to drive impact from geospatial data?
- Re: [sdw] Discussion thread for "Spatial Data on the Web 2022 – where next to drive impact from geospatial data" (#1271)
- Re: [sdw] Communicate good practice for defining geofences in the Best Practices doc (#1268)
- Re: [sdw] Communicate good practice for defining geofences in the Best Practices doc (#1268)
- Re: [sdw] Communicate good practice for defining geofences in the Best Practices doc (#1268)
- Re: [sdw] HTTP Redirect - with added semantics? (#1270)
- Re: [sdw] HTTP Redirect - with added semantics? (#1270)
- Re: [sdw] Discussion thread for "Spatial Data on the Web 2022 – where next to drive impact from geospatial data" (#1271)
- Re: [sdw] Discussion thread for "Spatial Data on the Web 2022 – where next to drive impact from geospatial data" (#1271)
- Re: [sdw] Discussion thread for "Spatial Data on the Web 2022 – where next to drive impact from geospatial data" (#1271)
- Re: [sdw] Discussion thread for "Spatial Data on the Web 2022 – where next to drive impact from geospatial data" (#1271)
- Re: [sdw] Discussion thread for "Spatial Data on the Web 2022 – where next to drive impact from geospatial data" (#1271)
- Re: [sdw] SDW2022 need to continue existing activities too (#1271)
- Re: [sdw] Re: SDW2022 need to continue existing activities too (#1272)
- Closed: [sdw] Re: SDW2022 need to continue existing activities too (#1272)
- [sdw] new commits pushed by lvdbrink
- [sdw] Re: SDW2022 need to continue existing activities too (#1272)
- [sdw] SDW2022 need to continue existing activities too (#1271)
- [sdw] new commits pushed by 6a6d74
- Spatial Data on the Web 2022 – where next to drive impact from geospatial data (a new OGC Discussion Paper / W3C Note)
- [sdw] new commits pushed by lvdbrink
- RE: Plenary call agenda: Thu 22 Jul, 13-14.00UTC (updated)
Monday, 19 July 2021
- Re: [sdw] Communicate good practice for defining geofences in the Best Practices doc (#1268)
- Re: [sdw] Communicate good practice for defining geofences in the Best Practices doc (#1268)
- Re: [sdw] Communicate good practice for defining geofences in the Best Practices doc (#1268)