- From: Élie Roux <elie.roux@telecom-bretagne.eu>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 12:45:49 +0200
- To: "public-sdwig@w3.org" <public-sdwig@w3.org>
Dear All, Thanks Simon for your answer! I think I misrepresented the type of extension I'm thinking of, as I can't really see it mentioned in the ISO docs. Here's one of the examples I'm thinking of: a typical sequence of day of the month (or month of the year) in a lunar calendar is as follows: 1 2 2 (bis) 3 5 where there are duplicate and omitted values. In that case, my first instinct is to use literals that would go like "---1"^^time:generalDay "---2"^^time:generalDay "---2b"^^time:generalDay "---3"^^time:generalDay "---5"^^time:generalDay but "---2b"^^time:generalDay is invalid as it contains a "b" (I just made that notation up but I don't think there's any). Another option would be something like time:dayIsDuplicate true (but this has subtle problems with the open world assumption). This kind of feature is common to so many calendar systems all over the world that I think it would be a valuable addition to OWL-Time and would ease the design of extensions significantly. What do you think? Best, -- Elie
Received on Friday, 22 May 2020 10:46:13 UTC