RE: Review: New charter

I think it does make sense. The SSN and OWL-Time errata and extensions are better at home in a WG, at least. 

I'm hesitant to have an IG as well, running two groups might mean more overhead... Couldn't the WG be scoped to manage the other interests as well, besides the concrete deliverables?

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> 
Verzonden: maandag 30 maart 2020 17:15
Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>; public-sdwig@w3.org
CC: Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk) <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter

Hi all,

W3C Management is encouraging us to draft a charter for a Working Group given the amount of work on REC track. A question is whether to also have an Interest Group given the number of well, interests besides what we can presently list as deliverables. 

What are others' thoughts?

On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 12:59 +0000, Linda van den Brink wrote:
> Hi all,
>  
> I updated the charter today (finally…) and resolved all the comments.
>  
> I believe the charter as it is now formulated at 
> https://w3c.github.io/sdw/roadmap/charter-2020.html can go ahead 
> through the W3C approval process. @ted@w3.org, what’s the next step 
> for that?
>  
> I confirmed with Scott Simmons that at the OGC side, nothing needs to 
> be done in this case.
>  
> Linda
>  
> Van: Rob Smith <rob.smith@awayteam.co.uk>
> Verzonden: donderdag 27 februari 2020 14:01
> Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
> CC: public-sdwig@w3.org; ted@w3.org; Jeremy Tandy (
> jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk) <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
> Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter
>  
> Linda,
>  
> Apologies the delay in replying.
>  
> Yes, I think it would be beneficial to include a WebVMT Note 
> deliverable in the new charter. There are a number of items currently 
> incubating for inclusion in the Editor’s Draft, and publishing a Note 
> subsequently would be a good aim.
>  
> The groups for WebVMT coordination at W3C are the Media Timed Events 
> Task Force [1], which is part of the Media & Entertainment IG, and 
> WICG DataCue [2] for video metadata. I’m unsure of MTE TF charter 
> status, but will confirm with Chris Needham and let you know. I can 
> also confirm that the relevant OGC groups are ARML for camera, Moving 
> Features for interpolation and Sensor Things for data sync, which are 
> already included in the current charter. The other possible connection 
> is OGC Geopose [3], again for camera.
>  
> Thanks for your help, and please let me know if you need any further 
> details.
>  
> Rob Smith
>  
> Away Team
> www.awayteam.co.uk
>  
> [1]
> https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Media_Timed_Events_TF

> [2] https://github.com/WICG/datacue/

> [3] https://www.ogc.org/projects/groups/geoposeswg

>  
> > On 18 Feb 2020, at 10:54, Linda van den Brink < 
> > l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> wrote:
> >  
> > Dear SDWIG members,
> >  
> > Ted and I have been working on the charter renewal for our group.
> > We would like the charter’s start date to be 1 April 2020 (which is 
> > a bit ambitious, but let’s go for it). Please send in your comments 
> > within two weeks as a reply to this email. We will also consider 
> > pull requests.
> >  
> > I have a specific question for @Rob Smith;
> >  
> > Do you want the charter to mention a Note about WebVMT as a specific 
> > work item, and/or to add the web media text tracks community group 
> > to the list of W3C groups to coordinate with?
> >  
> > @all: Please let us know if any other work item should be mentioned 
> > explicitly.
> >  
> > The draft charter is at: 
> > https://w3c.github.io/sdw/roadmap/charter-2020.html

> >  
> > Linda
> 
>  
>  
> 
> Away Team
> www.awayteam.co.uk
>  
--
Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
W3C Automotive Lead
https://www.w3.org/auto

Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2020 06:39:44 UTC