- From: Chris Little via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 13:01:41 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
@dr-shorthair, @tguild Thank you. Spotted a couple of minor inconsistencies, but again in the [referenced time ontology](https://www.w3.org/2006/time). Rhetorical question: why does my brain see them, even without coffee? ;-)
1. In skos, the language tags (@en, @zh, etc) seem to adhere to IETF BCP47/RFC5646, which states "Interoperability is best served when the same language tag is used consistently to represent the same language." Japanese is represented by both @ja and @jp.
@ja is the defined tag for the Japanese language, and @jp is not defined in ISO639 etc.
jp is the code for the country Japan.
Is it too late to alter, or should we just leave it as is?
@ja is used in for the days of the week for the 2006 version (Monday, Tuesday, etc)
@jp occurs only in the unitSecond, unitMinute, unitHour, unitDay, unitWeek, unitMonth and unitYear definitions.
2. The text for the Asian languages for the unit definitions still have some inconsistencies, using both Chinese '一' ("yi") and Western '1' ("unit"). The Chinese is now consistent, but unitWeek and unitYear are using the western 1 for both Japanese and Korean. Native speaker needs to confirm correctness or correct.
3. An upper-case has crept back into the Polish definition for unitSecond:
"skos:prefLabel "Sekundę"@pl ;" should read "skos:prefLabel "sekundę"@pl ;"
--
GitHub Notification of comment by chris-little
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1173#issuecomment-648805283 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2020 13:01:43 UTC