Re: [sdw] time:isPartof in the abstract should be time:isPartOf (#1183) from Chris Little via GitHub on 2020-07-08 (public-sdwig@w3.org from July 2020)

From: Chris Little via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 16:52:38 +0000
To: public-sdwig@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-655636364-1594227158-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

@tguild @dr-shorthair I've checked the definitions and formal documents. All state "isPartOf". The error is in the English in the abstract "time:isPartof". 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by chris-little
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1183#issuecomment-655636364 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2020 16:52:40 UTC