W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdwig@w3.org > May 2019

RE: [sdw] Articulate how sensorML Sensor models and parameters relate to SSN (#1125)

From: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 07:13:03 +0000
To: Josh Lieberman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>, "public-sdwig@w3.org" <public-sdwig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <SYXPR01MB2030FAC2D5EF511D63F555BEA41E0@SYXPR01MB2030.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Josh, Rob,
>"As discussed in the Core Concepts, any process can have inputs, outputs, and parameters"
> 
> SSN does not make any reference to such "parameters" although some concepts such as capability are explicitly modelled.
>

SSN does indeed have a builtin "process" concept (newly called "procedure" ) with ssn:hasInputs and ssn:hasOutputs . I believe it used to be a process in the old ssn just because of Sensorml.  Also if you look at the old ssn finalreport it developed a (slightly buggy) rdfa approach for marking up sensorml with ssn ontology concepts. I think this is not what you mean, but it might be a good place to start?

-Kerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Lieberman via GitHub [mailto:sysbot+gh@w3.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, 7 May 2019 9:26 PM
To: public-sdwig@w3.org
Subject: Re: [sdw] Articulate how sensorML Sensor models and parameters relate to SSN (#1125)

The latter, I believe. A SensorML extension for SSN would be quite valuable.

—Josh

> Josh Lieberman, Ph.D.
> jlieberman@opengeospatial.org
> Tel. +1 617 431 6431


> On May 7, 2019, at 3:38 AM, Rob Atkinson <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> 
> O&M has a concept observation procedures, and SensorML codifies a model for this :
> 
> "the procedure property within an Observation instance may reference a SensorML description of the measurement process"
> 
> also
> 
> "As discussed in the Core Concepts, any process can have inputs, outputs, and parameters"
> 
> SSN does not make any reference to such "parameters" although some concepts such as capability are explicitly modelled.
> 
> is this out of scope, an oversight, or a valid concern for an extension?
> 
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.


--
GitHub Notification of comment by lieberjosh Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1125#issuecomment-490039738 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 28 May 2019 07:13:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:17:53 UTC