dataCube is i think somewhat more general: 1) it doesnt restrict the number of measures or the implied set of observation procedures (SOSA requires all results to be from the one observation procedure - QB could be seen as defining a "virtual" observation procedures made up of a set of individual observations - but mapping gets tricky here..) 2) attributes may be things other than information about the observation as a more general meta-model the thing to do would be to declare a formal profile of QB to match SOSA semantics. This should likely be a formal profile of QB4ST since observations are intrinsically about "T" - there;s a motivation to review and if necessary update that work in the SDWIG :-) - please dont reinvent that wheel... -- GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1154#issuecomment-563426203 using your GitHub accountReceived on Monday, 9 December 2019 20:35:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:02 UTC