- From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 04:01:01 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
Yes, feature-of-interest is primarily a role. We also wanted a class for the set of things on which observations had been, or might be, made. You are quite correct that this could be more or less anything, so the sosa:FeatureOfInterest class is very very general - similar to GF_Feature or Feature from ISO 19109. We could possibly have just used `owl:Thing` or 'owl:NamedIndividual`, but we went with `sosa:FeatureOfInterest`. As @kjano implies there is no harm in giving this class a name, and it allows us to add additional axioms which assist in clarifying some of the intentions elsewhere in the ontology. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1122#issuecomment-487252461 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 27 April 2019 04:01:03 UTC