- From: kjano via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 03:26:33 +0000
- To: public-sdwig@w3.org
IMHO, this would be really odd as it would raise the question what the relationship between hasProperty and observedProperty is. On 02/11/2018 07:25 PM, Armin Haller wrote: > > If we move the hasProperty to SOSA we can still keep the sub-property > definition in the SSN ontology. So we narrow the semantics of the > property in SSN, as we do with some other classes/properties. > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1006#issuecomment-364820876>, or > mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABrH9hJbVjU-M6l1DfbX1Sm1CPlbBDzwks5tT68egaJpZM4R_JQC>. > -- Krzysztof Janowicz Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net -- GitHub Notification of comment by kjano Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1006#issuecomment-364820964 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 12 February 2018 03:26:36 UTC