W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdwig@w3.org > February 2018

Re: [sdw] Move hasProperty from SSN to SOSA namespace

From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 22:47:15 +0000
To: public-sdwig@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-364275109-1518130033-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Thread copied from #1004 

dr-shorthair commented 41 minutes ago
@rgcmme you have a point. I guess hasProperty domainIncludes both Sample and FeatureOfInterest?
Maybe open a separate issue ...

 kjano commented 38 minutes ago
Keep in mind that this would force us to include sub-property axioms
which may or may not be a good idea, but last time we decided not to do so.

dr-shorthair commented 33 minutes ago
@kjano Which sub-properties?

 kjano commented 28 minutes ago
If we have hasProperty, we would need to relate it to observedProperty
and so on. If I can /observe/ a property of a FOI, it /has/ said property.

dr-shorthair commented 20 minutes ago
I can see that there may be some rules involving property-chains, but they are non-trivial - not sure they can be expressed in OWL.

 kjano commented 17 minutes ago
I would simply state that observedProperty is a sub-property of hasProperty.

dr-shorthair commented 13 minutes ago
DIfferent domains. Unless you are suggesting there is a subsumption relationship involving FOI and Observation?

GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1006#issuecomment-364275109 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2018 22:47:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:30:59 UTC