Re: [sdw] Update of OWL-Time ontology, extended with rdfs:label, rdfs:comment a…

That’s helpful. 
I found an additional stray assertion:

:intervalEquals owl:propertyDisjointWith :intervalIn . 

This may be correct, but is a semantic modification to what was agreed so can’t be slipped through in this way. 

Also: \n\n linefeeds inside strings are not reliably valid RDF. Turtle supports multi-line text inside triple quotes. 

Finally – the rdfs:Description type assertions are redundant in the .ttl and .nt versions at least. 
I can see how they might have sneaked in because of moving the translations to a separate block, but they can be removed from the .ttl and .nt versions at least. 


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/1002#issuecomment-362948394 using your GitHub account

Received on Sunday, 4 February 2018 23:09:51 UTC