Re: Suggested Update Reference to SWEET in http://w3c.github.io/sdw/eo-qb/

Hi Folks,
Thank you for the responses
To answer the question "Are there other updates that could be worth incorporating at the same time?", I suppose we could ask for a complete review by the current SDW community. This would increase the likelihood of us addressing the maintenance and extension issues you've highlighted.
Please keep us involved, thank you.
Lewis

On 12/12/18, 2:12 AM, "Francois Daoust" <fd@w3.org> wrote:

    Yes, the Spatial Data on the Web IG is chartered to maintain (and possibly extend) this spec, so we can certainly republish a new version of the Note with the fix.
    
    Process-wise, I need to investigate possible changes to the Status of This Document section (which currently says that the document is published by the Working Group) to note the transition to the IG. In parallel, we should issue a proper call for consensus within the IG to republish EO-QB as a Note, in order to have a public record of the group's willingness to do so.
    
    Are there other updates that could be worth incorporating at the same time?
    
    Francois.
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
    > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 3:11 PM
    > To: Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M) <Lewis.J.McGibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>; public-
    > sdwig@w3.org; 'Francois Daoust' <fd@w3.org>; Francois Daoust (fd@w3.org)
    > <fd@w3.org>
    > Cc: esip-semanticweb@lists.esipfed.org
    > Subject: RE: Suggested Update Reference to SWEET in
    > http://w3c.github.io/sdw/eo-qb/

    > 
    > Thank you, Lewis!
    > 
    > The document about EO-QB was written by the predecessor of our group, by
    > authors who are no longer active within SDWIG. However, I think we could
    > update the Note to reflect your suggested change, if we want. It seems like a
    > good thing to do.
    > 
    > François, Jeremy, what do you think?
    > 
    > Van: Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M) <Lewis.J.McGibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>
    > Verzonden: maandag 3 december 2018 23:56
    > Aan: public-sdwig@w3.org
    > CC: esip-semanticweb@lists.esipfed.org
    > Onderwerp: Re: Suggested Update Reference to SWEET in
    > http://w3c.github.io/sdw/eo-qb/

    > 
    > A Pull Request is available at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/1104

    > Thank you for any review.
    > Lewis
    > 
    > Dr. Lewis John McGibbney Ph.D., B.Sc.
    > Data Scientist II
    > Computer Science for Data Intensive Applications Group (398M)
    > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
    > Jet Propulsion Laboratory
    > California Institute of Technology
    > 4800 Oak Grove Drive
    > Pasadena, California 91109-8099
    > Mail Stop : 158-256C
    > Tel:  (+1) (818)-393-7402
    > Cell: (+1) (626)-487-3476
    > Fax:  (+1) (818)-393-1190
    > Email:
    > lewis.j.mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:lewis.j.mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>
    > ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2185-928X
    > 
    >            [signature_219149959]
    > 
    >  Dare Mighty Things
    > 
    > From: "Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)"
    > <Lewis.J.McGibbney@jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:Lewis.J.McGibbney@jpl.nasa.gov
    > >>
    > Date: Friday, November 30, 2018 at 1:11 PM
    > To: "public-sdwig@w3.org<mailto:public-sdwig@w3.org>" <public-
    > sdwig@w3.org<mailto:public-sdwig@w3.org>>
    > Subject: Fwd: Suggested Update Reference to SWEET in
    > http://w3c.github.io/sdw/eo-qb/

    > 
    > Forwarding to alternative mailing list.
    > Sent from my iPhone
    > 
    > Begin forwarded message:
    > From:
    > <Lewis.J.McGibbney@jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:Lewis.J.McGibbney@jpl.nasa.gov
    > >>
    > Date: November 30, 2018 at 13:05:43 PST
    > To: <public-sdw-comments@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-comments@w3.org>>
    > Cc: <esip-semanticweb@lists.esipfed.org<mailto:esip-
    > semanticweb@lists.esipfed.org>>, <esip-cor@lists.esipfed.org<mailto:esip-
    > cor@lists.esipfed.org>>
    > Subject: Suggested Update Reference to SWEET in
    > http://w3c.github.io/sdw/eo-qb/

    > Good Afternoon SDW,
    > I wanted to bring to your attention a suggested edit to the above document
    > regarding use of and reference to the SWEET Ontology Suite. Initially
    > however I am very pleased to see mention and use of SWEET in this
    > document. I did write to the SDW WG some time ago mentioning why I
    > thought that SWEET should be considered as one of the important Semantic
    > Web vocabulary resources some time ago but was more or less shot down. I
    > am glad to see that the community has now changed its stance which has
    > ultimately resulted in SWEET being included in the above document.
    > We open sourced SWEET quite some time ago and took it out of NASA JPL
    > and into governance over at the ESIP Federation where it now lives and t
    > developed primarily by members of the ESIP Semantic Technologies
    > Committee.
    > The IRI http://sweet.jpl.nasa.gov is not maintained, does not resolve and is
    > non-functional.
    > The new IRI, minted and supported by ESIP is http://sweetontology.net

    > More documentation on our rationale for the IRI scheme can be found at the
    > project wiki https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet/wiki/SWEET-IRI-Patterns-

    > for-Ontologies-and-Their-Terms
    > Note SWEET is available as linked data through the ESIP Community Ontology
    > Repository which is why everything resolved.
    > It would be greatly appreciated if you could update the reference and usage
    > to the most recent. If you want me to submit a pull request for this please let
    > me know.
    > Thank you
    > Lewis
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > Sent from my iPhone

Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2018 18:08:38 UTC