- From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 14:11:06 +0000
- To: "Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)" <Lewis.J.McGibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>, "public-sdwig@w3.org" <public-sdwig@w3.org>, 'Francois Daoust' <fd@w3.org>, "Francois Daoust (fd@w3.org)" <fd@w3.org>
- CC: "esip-semanticweb@lists.esipfed.org" <esip-semanticweb@lists.esipfed.org>
- Message-ID: <VI1PR05MB5373F22ED30E7C20563BCE82FCA60@VI1PR05MB5373.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Thank you, Lewis! The document about EO-QB was written by the predecessor of our group, by authors who are no longer active within SDWIG. However, I think we could update the Note to reflect your suggested change, if we want. It seems like a good thing to do. François, Jeremy, what do you think? Van: Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M) <Lewis.J.McGibbney@jpl.nasa.gov> Verzonden: maandag 3 december 2018 23:56 Aan: public-sdwig@w3.org CC: esip-semanticweb@lists.esipfed.org Onderwerp: Re: Suggested Update Reference to SWEET in http://w3c.github.io/sdw/eo-qb/ A Pull Request is available at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/1104 Thank you for any review. Lewis Dr. Lewis John McGibbney Ph.D., B.Sc. Data Scientist II Computer Science for Data Intensive Applications Group (398M) Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena, California 91109-8099 Mail Stop : 158-256C Tel: (+1) (818)-393-7402 Cell: (+1) (626)-487-3476 Fax: (+1) (818)-393-1190 Email: lewis.j.mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:lewis.j.mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov> ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2185-928X [signature_219149959] Dare Mighty Things From: "Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)" <Lewis.J.McGibbney@jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:Lewis.J.McGibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>> Date: Friday, November 30, 2018 at 1:11 PM To: "public-sdwig@w3.org<mailto:public-sdwig@w3.org>" <public-sdwig@w3.org<mailto:public-sdwig@w3.org>> Subject: Fwd: Suggested Update Reference to SWEET in http://w3c.github.io/sdw/eo-qb/ Forwarding to alternative mailing list. Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: <Lewis.J.McGibbney@jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:Lewis.J.McGibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>> Date: November 30, 2018 at 13:05:43 PST To: <public-sdw-comments@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-comments@w3.org>> Cc: <esip-semanticweb@lists.esipfed.org<mailto:esip-semanticweb@lists.esipfed.org>>, <esip-cor@lists.esipfed.org<mailto:esip-cor@lists.esipfed.org>> Subject: Suggested Update Reference to SWEET in http://w3c.github.io/sdw/eo-qb/ Good Afternoon SDW, I wanted to bring to your attention a suggested edit to the above document regarding use of and reference to the SWEET Ontology Suite. Initially however I am very pleased to see mention and use of SWEET in this document. I did write to the SDW WG some time ago mentioning why I thought that SWEET should be considered as one of the important Semantic Web vocabulary resources some time ago but was more or less shot down. I am glad to see that the community has now changed its stance which has ultimately resulted in SWEET being included in the above document. We open sourced SWEET quite some time ago and took it out of NASA JPL and into governance over at the ESIP Federation where it now lives and t developed primarily by members of the ESIP Semantic Technologies Committee. The IRI http://sweet.jpl.nasa.gov is not maintained, does not resolve and is non-functional. The new IRI, minted and supported by ESIP is http://sweetontology.net More documentation on our rationale for the IRI scheme can be found at the project wiki https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet/wiki/SWEET-IRI-Patterns-for-Ontologies-and-Their-Terms Note SWEET is available as linked data through the ESIP Community Ontology Repository which is why everything resolved. It would be greatly appreciated if you could update the reference and usage to the most recent. If you want me to submit a pull request for this please let me know. Thank you Lewis Sent from my iPhone
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2018 14:11:56 UTC