Re: Notation Question in the examples on SOSA/SSN

Dear all,

on this topic there have been objective recommendations by the W3C:
https://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/#choosing

Hashes are fine in small graphs, like an ontology, but complicate
matters in larger graphs. Moreover, the trend towards ReST also
benefits the forward slashes.

Regards.

-- 
Luís Moreira de Sousa

INESC-ID
Instituto Superior Técnico
University of Lisbon

On Mon, 2024-09-30 at 18:53 +1000, Rob Atkinson wrote:
> Whilst all legal URI forms are valid,  the inconsistency is
> unhelpful, and these particular examples are idiosyncratic and
> inconsistent with the original O&M model of a GF_Property.  
> SOSA is more agnostic, but real systems are going to  need to have an
> identifiable architecture pattern for properties.  So can we
> decide which style of examples we need to show - and push the others
> to a register of examples?
> 
> 
> Rob Atkinson
> Senior Research Engineer  | Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)
> Mobile: +61 419 202973
> ratkinson@ogc.org | ogc.org | @opengeospatial
> 
> 
> 
> Sign up for OGC News
> 
> 
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 12:11 AM Robert Warren
> <warren@glengarryag.com> wrote:
> > It strikes me as wrong. -rhw
> > 
> > On Fri, Sept 27, 2024, 6:08 a.m. Kathi Schleidt <kathi@datacove.eu>
> > wrote:
> > >  
> > >  Hi all,
> > >  going through and analysing the examples for SOSA/SSN, I've
> > > noticed two different notations, sometimes used interchangeably.
> > > Has to with associations from a class, I see both '/' and '#'
> > > being used, at times within the same example. See C.4 Tree height
> > > measurement, where the ObsProp is tightly bound to the FoI. Here
> > > we find both versions, e.g.:
> > >   * <tree/124/height>
> > >  * <tree/124#height>
> > >  Does the # version convey some subtly of meaning that I'm not
> > > aware of, or are these 2 syntax options just being used
> > > interchangeably? If they're the same, I'd be for using /
> > > everywhere
> > >  
> > >  :?
> > >  Kathi
> > >  
> > >  On 24.09.2024 12:40, Simon Cox wrote:
> > >  
> > >  
> > > >  
> > > > i.e. in 24 hours and 20 minutes time
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > Agenda and rolling notes
> > > > here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15TBmYhgRjncdd_bvmTKyg
> > > > CD8aIhQo1-Tkg3eOKjYNTw/edit 
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > Highlights:
> > > >  
> > > >     1. Completion plan - Triage topics so we can finish this
> > > > century
> > > >    2. Issues
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > 
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > >   Cheers - Simon 
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > >  dr.shorthair@pm.me
> > > >  https://github.com/dr-shorthair 
> > > >  
> > > >  +61 403 302 672
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > >  On Boonwurrung land 
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > >   Sent with Proton Mail secure email. 
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > >

Received on Monday, 30 September 2024 09:27:04 UTC