- From: Simon Cox <dr.shorthair@pm.me>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 00:11:10 +0000
- To: SDW WG <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <VDdNQv10ozVnW5woq8gB7zMpV_Bp0smcOnzRmdskN54Pb-hXI09q6ppQ8JGYBQI4XZLbKfJF-43JGfi>
Following the agreement of this week's telecon, I have prepared a PR https://github.com/w3c/sdw-sosa-ssn/pull/226 This implements the following set of coupled changes - move ObservingProcedure and SamplingProcedure into the sosa-oms: namespace used for additional terms required for the alignment of SSN and OMS - add madeBySystem and madeExecution 'abstract' super-properties required for the generalized Execution pattern - added an additional overview diagram for the Execution pattern https://raw.githack.com/w3c/sdw-sosa-ssn/225-madebysystem/ssn/index.html#overview-of-classes-and-properties - added scope-notes explaining that System, Execution and the new properties are to be considered 'abstract' and should not be used directly, e.g. https://raw.githack.com/w3c/sdw-sosa-ssn/225-madebysystem/ssn/index.html#SOSAExecution I think these address the concerns raised in https://github.com/w3c/sdw-sosa-ssn/issues/225 and https://github.com/w3c/sdw-sosa-ssn/issues/235 I'd be grateful if you all would review the PR to check that I covered the bases. Cheers - Simon dr.shorthair@pm.me https://github.com/dr-shorthair +61 403 302 672 On Boonwurrung land Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
Received on Friday, 19 July 2024 00:11:22 UTC