Hi Timo,
> Right now there is no formalised way for us to get this ontology going within OGC, but it is on the agenda to solve this issue by the end of the year.
>
> So in that way it can of course be good to get a commitment by W3C to co-publish the CRS ontology once we have figured out the way to proceed within OGC.
I think we should keep a "CRS Ontology" on the Charter then and put in some notes somewhere that the method here is as you suggest: formulate the team in the OGC then pair up with W3C members to progress it as a joint thing.
Cheers, Nick
On Saturday, 10 August 2024 at 05:13, Timo Homburg <timo.homburg@gmx.de> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> that is great news!
>
> Just to avoid misunderstandings:
>
> There is a CRS Working Group within OGC, but this group is not involved in creating the CRS ontology.
>
> Right now there is no formalised way for us to get this ontology going within OGC, but it is on the agenda to solve this issue by the end of the year.
>
> So in that way it can of course be good to get a commitment by W3C to co-publish the CRS ontology once we have figured out the way to proceeed within OGC.
>
> Best
>
> Timo Homburg
>
> Am 09.08.2024 um 02:55 schrieb Rob Atkinson:
>
>> Thanks Nick
>>
>> we will take this on board at the next SDW/SOSA meeting - all are welcome to participate to discuss this. Just drop me an email and I'll add you to access the rolling minutes with connection details.
>>
>> IMHO the SWG proposing this implies a commitment to run regular meetings open to W3C members of the group, I think we just need to confirm that the GeoSPARQL SWG and CRS SWG group arrangements in place for these to fulfil this role.
>>
>> The logistics issue to determine is whether the Respec document template is to be used. Ideally something like pyLODE could be used to produce respec and metanorma friendly content.
>>
>> Rob Atkinson
>> Senior Research Engineer | Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)
>> Mobile: +61 419 202973
>> ratkinson@ogc.org | [ogc.org](http://ogc.org/) | @opengeospatial
>>
>> [Sign up for OGC News](https://ogc.us4.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=704e02f81107a6caab1568067&id=4e4528fd9d)
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 5:15 AM Nicholas Car <nick@kurrawong.ai> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear SDW WG,
>>>
>>> The OGC's GeoSemantics DWG and GeoSPARQL & CRS Ontology SWGs request that the SDW WG publish the next version of GeoSPARQL and the first version of the CRS Ontology as joint W3c/OGC standards.
>>>
>>> To this end, we have created a Pull Request to add those publications to the SDW WG's Draft Charter: https://github.com/w3c/charter-drafts/pull/565.
>>>
>>> Our reasoning for this request is given in description of the PR.
>>>
>>> Please could you review this request and provide feedback either on the PR or directly to the GeoSemantics DWG at GeoSemWeb@lists.ogc.org
>>>
>>> Regards, Nicholas Car
>>> GeoSPARQL SWG member & SDW WG member
>>> on behalf of the GeoSemantics DWG