W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > September 2017

RE: Call for consensus: publication of the Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices document as final WG Note

From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:25:21 +0200
To: "'Francois Daoust'" <fd@w3.org>, <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Cc: "'Jeremy Tandy'" <jtandy@wmo.int>
Message-ID: <149a01d33698$a00e0a80$e02a1f80$@geonovum.nl>
Hi Francois, 

As far as I know the OGC is all done voting, at least the motion to publish this as a BP has passed the technical committee. 

You're right about the type, could you add that to the PR?

Linda

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Francois Daoust [mailto:fd@w3.org] 
Verzonden: maandag 25 september 2017 16:58
Aan: public-sdw-wg@w3.org
CC: 'Jeremy Tandy'; Linda van den Brink
Onderwerp: RE: Call for consensus: publication of the Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices document as final WG Note

Jeremy, Linda,

I prepared a minor editorial update to add a "changes since 11 May 2017" section and to adjust the Status of This Document (SOTD) section accordingly:

https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/970

There may be further updates to make to the OGC part of the SOTD.

Could you check and merge, please?


Also, I noticed the following sentence in a recent commit: 
"Technically, there is nothing stop one writing, say, a GRIB decoder in JavaScript"

... and I wonder whether there might be a typo there. Or is that proper English? I would have expected something like:
"Technically, there is nothing *that stops one from* writing, say, a GRIB decoder in JavaScript"

Thanks,
Francois.


> From: Francois Daoust [mailto:fd@w3.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 9:58 PM
> 
> Hello Spatial Data on the Web Working Group participants,
> 
> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to request publication of the 
> latest Editor's Draft of the Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices 
> document as a final Working Group Note.
> 
> The latest Editor's Draft is available at:
> https://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/
> 
> The document was reviewed internally by OGC Members over summer. A few 
> recent changes were made to the document as a result of this review, 
> as well as to fix remaining editorial issues that had been raised some time ago.
> 
> Main changes:
> - A note was added to note the absence of scientific format in the 
> "common format" table:
> https://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#applicability-formatVbp
> - Some text was added to the scope section to note that critical 
> decision making scenarios based on spatial data are beyond the scope 
> of this Best Practices document:
> https://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#scope-spatialdata
> 
> You may check GitHub's commit history for details:
> https://github.com/w3c/sdw/commits/gh-pages/bp/index.html
> 
> Please let us know if you have any concerns by next Monday 25 
> September 2017.
> Silence is considered consent.
> 
> Thanks,
> Francois,
> W3C team contact
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2017 07:25:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:33 UTC