- From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:25:21 +0200
- To: "'Francois Daoust'" <fd@w3.org>, <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Jeremy Tandy'" <jtandy@wmo.int>
Hi Francois, As far as I know the OGC is all done voting, at least the motion to publish this as a BP has passed the technical committee. You're right about the type, could you add that to the PR? Linda -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Francois Daoust [mailto:fd@w3.org] Verzonden: maandag 25 september 2017 16:58 Aan: public-sdw-wg@w3.org CC: 'Jeremy Tandy'; Linda van den Brink Onderwerp: RE: Call for consensus: publication of the Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices document as final WG Note Jeremy, Linda, I prepared a minor editorial update to add a "changes since 11 May 2017" section and to adjust the Status of This Document (SOTD) section accordingly: https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/970 There may be further updates to make to the OGC part of the SOTD. Could you check and merge, please? Also, I noticed the following sentence in a recent commit: "Technically, there is nothing stop one writing, say, a GRIB decoder in JavaScript" ... and I wonder whether there might be a typo there. Or is that proper English? I would have expected something like: "Technically, there is nothing *that stops one from* writing, say, a GRIB decoder in JavaScript" Thanks, Francois. > From: Francois Daoust [mailto:fd@w3.org] > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 9:58 PM > > Hello Spatial Data on the Web Working Group participants, > > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to request publication of the > latest Editor's Draft of the Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices > document as a final Working Group Note. > > The latest Editor's Draft is available at: > https://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/ > > The document was reviewed internally by OGC Members over summer. A few > recent changes were made to the document as a result of this review, > as well as to fix remaining editorial issues that had been raised some time ago. > > Main changes: > - A note was added to note the absence of scientific format in the > "common format" table: > https://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#applicability-formatVbp > - Some text was added to the scope section to note that critical > decision making scenarios based on spatial data are beyond the scope > of this Best Practices document: > https://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#scope-spatialdata > > You may check GitHub's commit history for details: > https://github.com/w3c/sdw/commits/gh-pages/bp/index.html > > Please let us know if you have any concerns by next Monday 25 > September 2017. > Silence is considered consent. > > Thanks, > Francois, > W3C team contact > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2017 07:25:31 UTC