- From: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 14:00:30 +0000
- To: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, public-sdw-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CALsPASVG4tm-SfZoVXOoZiM9Fn1zi0oscVnGo3gpOQiGkGZ46Q@mail.gmail.com>
Oh and now that Lionel raised an issue in dht22.ttl example, it makes me think: wouldn't it be nice to have the examples online too ? Le jeu. 6 juil. 2017 14:27, Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr> a écrit : > Thanks François, things are moving in the right direction ! > > you're probably missing in the "integrated" folder : > - ssnx.ttl to be published at http://www.w3.org/2017/01/ssn-ssnx/ > > Then, I just realized there are some nits and issued a last pull request, > please wait untill it's accepted before publishing them > > - sometimes the ontologies URI used https instead of http for www.w3.org > - I harmonized the ontology metadata including license, but let Simon as > the creator when he had explicitly set this metadata > > See https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/941 > > Best, > Maxime > > > Le jeu. 6 juil. 2017 à 11:49, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> a écrit : > >> Hello SSN folks, >> >> As I'm preparing the upcoming publication of the SSN ontology as a W3C >> Candidate Recommendation, I'd like to make sure we agree on where you >> expect ontology files linked from the spec to end up: >> >> Ontologies in the "integrated" folder: >> - sosa.ttl to be published at http://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/ >> - ssn-dul.ttl to be published at http://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/dul >> - ssn-system.ttl to be published at http://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/systems/ >> - ssn.ttl to be published at http://www.w3.org/ns/ssn/ >> >> Ontologies in the "rdf" folder: >> - sample-relations.ttl to be published at >> http://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/sampling/ >> - sosa-om-mapping.ttl to be published at http://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/om >> - sosa-prov-mapping.ttl to be published at >> http://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/prov/ >> - sosa-oboe-mapping.ttl to be published at http://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/oboe >> (I note the spec does not mention that namespace though) >> >> Is that correct? Did I miss something? >> >> Thanks, >> Francois. >> >> >>
Received on Thursday, 6 July 2017 14:01:16 UTC