- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:31:00 +0100
- To: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, "janowicz@ucsb.edu" <janowicz@ucsb.edu>, Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>, Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, "Cox, Simon (CESRE, Kensington)" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, "maxime.lefrancois.86@gmail.com" <maxime.lefrancois.86@gmail.com>
Hello, > If someone wants to work with the core of ssn alone (ie the simple > part) then all the terms of that core must be in a different > namespace (and I mean namespace) to any of the terms in the more > complex part (the full ssn). Tools will go and retrieve the ontology > file from the namespace URI that the term refers to, so such tools > need to retrieve a file that contains the core alone when only core > terms are being used. What are those "tools" that behave like this? I'm not doubting that this may indeed be the behavior of "some" tools but given that this is AFAIK not something that a standard has indicated that a tool should do, why such a behavior should guide the modeling decision of SSN? Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech Data Science Department 450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2017 08:31:35 UTC