public-sdw-wg@w3.org from February 2017 by date

Tuesday, 28 February 2017

• Re: [w3c/sdw] Update sosa.ttl (#584) Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Rob Atkinson
• Re: [w3c/sdw] Update sosa.ttl (#584) Maxime Lefrançois
• [Minutes SSN] 2017 02 28 Phil Archer
• Re: I can't make coverage sub-group call tomorrow Rob Atkinson
• Re: BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc Phil Archer
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Krzysztof Janowicz
• I can't make coverage sub-group call tomorrow Bill Roberts
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty Rob Atkinson
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Joshua Lieberman
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Joshua Lieberman
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Joshua Lieberman
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Joshua Lieberman
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc Jeremy Tandy
• BP sub-group call, Wed 1 March @ 16:00utc Jeremy Tandy
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values Jeremy Tandy
• RE: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Kerry Taylor
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values Jeremy Tandy
• Re: Lars's comments on the BP document (was: BP document is FROZEN pending vote to release next WD) Jeremy Tandy
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• Re: [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 Rob Atkinson
• RE: [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Monday, 27 February 2017

• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values Rob Atkinson
• Re: [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 Ghislain Atemezing-Pro
• Re: [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 Rob H Warren
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values Jon Blower
• Re: WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Jeremy Tandy
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values Joshua Lieberman
• Fwd: Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values Phil Archer
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values Ed Parsons
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values Phil Archer
• Re: WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values Clemens Portele
• WG discussion: shall we recommend a "samePlaceAs" property? Jeremy Tandy
• WG discussion: proposal to remove BP2 - Provide context required to interpret data values Jeremy Tandy
• Agenda for extended SSN meeting this week - 28-02-17 20:00 - 23:00 UTC Armin Haller
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• [RELEASE] Apache Any23 2.0 lewis john mcgibbney
• Re: BP & SSN: feature of interest vs spatial thing Joshua Lieberman

Sunday, 26 February 2017

• RE: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• ISSUE-144 - OWL-Time - missing interval relations Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty Rob Atkinson
• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: BP & SSN: feature of interest vs spatial thing Krzysztof Janowicz
• ACTION-269 - associated pull request Maxime Lefrançois
• Structuring the discussion term by term in the Wiki Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: BP & SSN: feature of interest vs spatial thing Rob Atkinson
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• RE: ISSUE-66 RE: Time Ontology outstanding Issue 9 Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• OWL-Time - ISSUE-143 - need more guidance from Kerry Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Please review OWL-Time document Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: BP & SSN: feature of interest vs spatial thing Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: OWL-Time - Individual months, standard temporal durations Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• RE: OWL-Time ISSUE-127 TimeZone model Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• BP & SSN: feature of interest vs spatial thing Kerry Taylor
• RE: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Saturday, 25 February 2017

• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty Rob Atkinson
• RE: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Friday, 24 February 2017

• Re: [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty Raúl García Castro
• Re: Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty Rob Atkinson
• [Minutes] Plenary call - 2017-02-22 Francois Daoust
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• RE: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson

Thursday, 23 February 2017

• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Rob Atkinson
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Maxime Lefrançois
• RE: SDW @ RDA P9? Little, Chris
• Re: SDW @ RDA P9? Joshua Lieberman
• SDW @ RDA P9? andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• Link between FeatureOfInterest and xxxProperty Maxime Lefrançois
• Question on resolution 4 in the minutes of 21/02, Was: Updated the wiki according to the minutes, and implementation of ACTION-269: name of the link between Actuator and ActuatableProperty Maxime Lefrançois
• Question on Resolution 3 in the minutes of 21/02, Was: Updated the wiki according to the minutes, and implementation of ACTION-269: name of the link between Actuator and ActuatableProperty Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Raphaël Troncy
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Raphaël Troncy
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller
• Re: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Raphaël Troncy
• RE: SOSA/SSN integration architecture Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• SOSA/SSN integration architecture Armin Haller

Wednesday, 22 February 2017

• RE: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Armin Haller
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Raphaël Troncy
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Armin Haller
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Clear illustration of how much confusion the use of two namespaces brings to the users. Was: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Updated the wiki according to the minutes, and implementation of ACTION-269: name of the link between Actuator and ActuatableProperty Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Updated the wiki according to the minutes, and implementation of ACTION-269: name of the link between Actuator and ActuatableProperty Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Clemens Portele
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Raphaël Troncy
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Raphaël Troncy
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Maxime Lefrançois
• Clear illustration of how much confusion the use of two namespaces brings to the users. Was: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Maxime Lefrançois
• Updated the wiki according to the minutes, and implementation of ACTION-269: name of the link between Actuator and ActuatableProperty Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Clemens Portele
• Re: Asking the library community for input on the BP Jeremy Tandy
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Armin Haller
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Forecasts and observations - was I RE: SSN Thread for github issue 378 - Side effects of ssn:Observation being a kind of dul:Event instead of dul:Situation Armin Haller

Tuesday, 21 February 2017

• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Armin Haller
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Raphaël Troncy
• [Minutes SSN] Call 2017-02-21 Francois Daoust
• Document not loaded to right fragment (was: ssn -- and use case work to be done request for help) Francois Daoust
• Re: Metadata: bounding boxes Rob Atkinson
• Re: Metadata: bounding boxes Joshua Lieberman
• RE: Metadata: bounding boxes andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• Fwd: [TC-Announce] Delft TC -- INSPIRE - What if...? -- Workshop & call for position papers Ed Parsons
• Re: Asking the library community for input on the BP Ed Parsons
• Re: Metadata: bounding boxes Joshua Lieberman
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Raúl García Castro
• Re: Metadata: bounding boxes Joshua Lieberman
• RE: Metadata: bounding boxes andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• Re: SDW Next Plenary Meeting Bill Roberts
• Re: Forecasts and observations - was I RE: SSN Thread for github issue 378 - Side effects of ssn:Observation being a kind of dul:Event instead of dul:Situation Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: [SDWWG] SDW Next Plenary Meeting Scott Simmons
• Re: Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy Maxime Lefrançois
• RE: Forecasts and observations - was I RE: SSN Thread for github issue 378 - Side effects of ssn:Observation being a kind of dul:Event instead of dul:Situation Kerry Taylor
• Re: Metadata: bounding boxes Clemens Portele
• SDW Next Plenary Meeting Ed Parsons
• RE: Metadata: bounding boxes Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Metadata: bounding boxes Joshua Lieberman
• Re: Metadata: bounding boxes Rob Atkinson
• Re: Metadata: bounding boxes Joshua Lieberman
• Metadata: bounding boxes Rob Atkinson
• RE: Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: ssn and github Armin Haller
• Re: Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy Armin Haller

Monday, 20 February 2017

• RE: Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: ssn and github Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: ssn and github Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: ssn and github Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: ssn and github Krzysztof Janowicz
• Wiki pages to discuss ontology metadata for ssnx, sosa, and ssn Maxime Lefrançois
• Asking the library community for input on the BP Svensson, Lars
• Re: ISSUE-147, sub-issue Was: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 21-02-17 21:00 UTC Scott Simmons
• Re: SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Maxime Lefrançois
• Agenda SSN meeting this week - 21-02-17 21:00 UTC Armin Haller
• RE: Please review OWL-Time document Svensson, Lars
• RE: ssn and github Kerry Taylor
• Re: Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy Krzysztof Janowicz
• Proposed solution to Issue-108 - Naming issues with observedBy Armin Haller
• Responses to missed comments Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: OWL-Time - Individual months, standard temporal durations Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: OWL-Time ISSUE-127 TimeZone model Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Please review OWL-Time document Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• FW: ISSUE-125: Update datatypes in OWL Time Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• SDW plenary agenda item - Namespace for SOSA and SSN ontology Armin Haller
• RE: ssn and github Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Sunday, 19 February 2017

• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL Kerry Taylor
• ssn and github Kerry Taylor

Thursday, 16 February 2017

• Re: 16 Feb iteration of BP doc published Linda van den Brink
• Re: 16 Feb iteration of BP doc published Clemens Portele
• Re: 16 Feb iteration of BP doc published Phil Archer
• Re: 16 Feb iteration of BP doc published Phil Archer
• Re: 16 Feb iteration of BP doc published Clemens Portele
• 16 Feb iteration of BP doc published Phil Archer
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Raúl García Castro
• RE: Nine new questions for Actuation and Actuators. Was: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Kerry Taylor
• RE: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Kerry Taylor
• Re: Extended (3 hour) SSN subgroup meeting Armin Haller

Wednesday, 15 February 2017

• [Minutes BP] 2017 02 15 Phil Archer
• RE: ACTION-249: Further work on BP8 (geometry) andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• [Minutes SSN] 2017 02 14 Phil Archer
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Raúl García Castro
• Extended (3 hour) SSN subgroup meeting Armin Haller
• Sampling model Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Tuesday, 14 February 2017

• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Armin Haller
• Re: Nine new questions for Actuation and Actuators. Was: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Rob Atkinson
• RE: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Kerry Taylor
• Re: Nine new questions for Actuation and Actuators. Was: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Kerry Taylor
• RE: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 Kerry Taylor
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Armin Haller
• RE: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Kerry Taylor
• Re: Nine new questions for Actuation and Actuators. Was: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Raúl García Castro
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Joshua Lieberman
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Nine new questions for Actuation and Actuators. Was: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Krzysztof Janowicz
• Nine new questions for Actuation and Actuators. Was: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Coverage subgroup call this week Dmitry Brizhinev
• Re: SDW Best Practice sub-group call; Wed 15 Feb 2017 @ 16:00UTC Ed Parsons
• Re: SDW Best Practice sub-group call; Wed 15 Feb 2017 @ 16:00UTC Scott Simmons
• Re: Coverage subgroup call this week Scott Simmons
• Re: SDW Best Practice sub-group call; Wed 15 Feb 2017 @ 16:00UTC Jeremy Tandy
• Re: SDW Best Practice sub-group call; Wed 15 Feb 2017 @ 16:00UTC andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• SDW Best Practice sub-group call; Wed 15 Feb 2017 @ 16:00UTC Jeremy Tandy
• Coverage subgroup call this week Bill Roberts

Monday, 13 February 2017

• Some fun with OWL DL: Instances of oldssn:Property only become instances of sosa:ObservableProperty when they are the oldssn:observedProperty of an oldssn:Observation Maxime Lefrançois
• Are MeasurementProperties and OperatingProperties observable ? Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-02-17 21:00 UTC Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-02-17 21:00 UTC Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: ssn Proposal for Platform Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: actuable Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: actuable Joshua Lieberman
• Re: actuable Raúl García Castro
• RE: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 Kerry Taylor
• actuable Kerry Taylor
• ssn Proposal for Platform Kerry Taylor
• Re: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-02-17 21:00 UTC Scott Simmons
• Re: issue-87: wiki page Property_and_Observable_Property to compare the proposals Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: ISSUE-139, ISSUE-146, Methodology ? Was: alignment sosa to ssn Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Krzysztof Janowicz
• Agenda SSN meeting this week - 14-02-17 21:00 UTC Armin Haller
• Re: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Armin Haller
• RE: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Sunday, 12 February 2017

• Actuation and Actuators in SOSA (issue-91) Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: issue-87: wiki page Property_and_Observable_Property to compare the proposals Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: ISSUE-139, ISSUE-146, Methodology ? Was: alignment sosa to ssn Armin Haller
• Re: alignment sosa to ssn Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 Armin Haller
• Re: alignment sosa to ssn Armin Haller
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 Krzysztof Janowicz
• OWL-Time - Individual months, standard temporal durations Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: OWL-Time - superclasses for Position and Duration Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: issue-87: wiki page Property_and_Observable_Property to compare the proposals Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: ISSUE-139, ISSUE-146, Methodology ? Was: alignment sosa to ssn Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• FW: alignment sosa to ssn Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Saturday, 11 February 2017

• ISSUE-139, ISSUE-146, Methodology ? Was: alignment sosa to ssn Maxime Lefrançois
• alignment sosa to ssn Kerry Taylor

Friday, 10 February 2017

• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 Rob Atkinson
• Re: Procedure vs Process in SOSA & ISSUE-89 Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Procedure vs Process in SOSA & ISSUE-89 Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: units of measure - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations Maxime Lefrançois
• Procedure vs Process in SOSA & ISSUE-89 Armin Haller
• Re: ssn: issue-72 inverse properties in sosa-core Rob Atkinson
• Re: issue-87: wiki page Property_and_Observable_Property to compare the proposals Rob Atkinson
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: ssn: issue-72 inverse properties in sosa-core Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: issue-87: wiki page Property_and_Observable_Property to compare the proposals Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 Armin Haller
• Re: issue-87: wiki page Property_and_Observable_Property to compare the proposals Armin Haller
• RE: ssn: issue-72 inverse properties in sosa-core Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Thursday, 9 February 2017

• Re: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes Rob Atkinson
• issue-87: wiki page Property_and_Observable_Property to compare the proposals Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: ssn: issue-72 inverse properties in sosa-core Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 Maxime Lefrançois
• hasResult / Sampling in SOSA & ISSUE-90 Le Phuoc, Danh
• Re: ISSUE-142: January-December - classes or individuals Rob Atkinson
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Ghislain Atemezing
• RE: Lars's comments on the BP document (was: BP document is FROZEN pending vote to release next WD) Svensson, Lars
• RE: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Kerry Taylor
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Armin Haller
• Re: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) Krzysztof Janowicz
• ISSUE-142: January-December - classes or individuals Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Kerry Taylor
• RE: OWL-Time - superclasses for Position and Duration Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Rob Atkinson
• Re: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: ssn: issue-72 inverse properties in sosa-core Kerry Taylor
• Add RAMI to list of SSN implementations (Industrie 4.0) (was: RE: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN) Laurent Lefort
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) Rob Atkinson
• RE: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) Rob Atkinson

Wednesday, 8 February 2017

• hasResult / Sampling in SOSA Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Armin Haller
• Re: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) Armin Haller
• RE: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes Dan Brickley
• Fixed respec link Linda van den Brink
• [Minutes] 2017 02 18 Phil Archer
• Re: [w3c/sdw] changed any mention of owl:inverseOf into schema:inverseOf (#546) Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: [w3c/sdw] changed any mention of owl:inverseOf into schema:inverseOf (#546) Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: [w3c/sdw] changed any mention of owl:inverseOf into schema:inverseOf (#546) Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes Krzysztof Janowicz
• ISSUE-80 Was: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Regrets for BP call today Matthew Perry
• Re: ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: ssn: issue-72 inverse properties in sosa-core Maxime Lefrançois
• ISSUE-72 - schema:domainIncludes and schema:rangeIncludes Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Regrets for BP call today Claus Stadler
• Re: ssn: issue-72 inverse properties in sosa-core Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Lars's comments on the BP document (was: BP document is FROZEN pending vote to release next WD) Clemens Portele
• Re: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) Rob Atkinson
• ISSUE-148, Was: Integration of FeatureOfInterest, Property, isPropertyOf, hasProperty, ... and ObservableProperty Maxime Lefrançois
• ISSUE-148-8 domain-range, Was: Integration of FeatureOfInterest, Property, isPropertyOf, hasProperty, ... and ObservableProperty Maxime Lefrançois
• Lars's comments on the BP document (was: BP document is FROZEN pending vote to release next WD) Svensson, Lars
• Re: ISSUE-147, sub-issue Was: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Raúl García Castro
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Maxime Lefrançois
• ISSUE-147, sub-issue Was: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Maxime Lefrançois
• ISSUE-146 Was: Starting the integration process slowly on github Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: [SDWWG] Next SDW Plenary Call Clemens Portele
• Re: Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) Krzysztof Janowicz
• Non-dereferencable URIs (was Re: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment) Phil Archer
• [Minutes SSN] 2017 02 08 Phil Archer
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Armin Haller
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL Armin Haller

Tuesday, 7 February 2017

• RE: Next SDW Plenary Call Byron Cochrane
• Re: request for ssn agenda item please Rob Atkinson
• Re: request for ssn agenda item please Krzysztof Janowicz
• request for ssn agenda item please Kerry Taylor
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Rob Atkinson
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL Kerry Taylor
• RE: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL Kerry Taylor
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Rob Atkinson
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL Maxime Lefrançois
• RE: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Krzysztof Janowicz
• Integration of FeatureOfInterest, Property, isPropertyOf, hasProperty, ... and ObservableProperty Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL Rob Atkinson
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Armin Haller
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL Armin Haller
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Phil Archer
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Ghislain Atemezing-Pro
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Ghislain Atemezing
• To use or not to use recommended metadata in a W3C ontology ? Maxime Lefrançois
• Starting the integration process slowly on github Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: [w3c/sdw] Prefix declaration issues in ssnx (#537) Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Kerry Taylor
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Kerry Taylor
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only: FIRM PROPOSAL Kerry Taylor
• RE: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment Kerry Taylor
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Kerry Taylor
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: New proposal for SOSA Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Le Phuoc, Danh
• Re: New proposal for SOSA Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Le Phuoc, Danh
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Rob Atkinson
• RE: ACTION-255 - o&m alignment Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Different or same Namespace for SOSA/SSN Armin Haller
• Re: New proposal for SOSA Armin Haller
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Armin Haller
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: New proposal for SOSA Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Maxime Lefrançois
• New proposal for SOSA Maxime Lefrançois
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Kerry Taylor
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Armin Haller
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Armin Haller
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Armin Haller

Monday, 6 February 2017

• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Armin Haller
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Rob Atkinson
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Rob Atkinson
• Re: W3C RDF Data Cube dimensions definition Rob Atkinson
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Next SDW Plenary Call Raphaël Troncy
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Raphaël Troncy
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Le Phuoc, Danh
• Next SDW Plenary Call Ed Parsons
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Le Phuoc, Danh
• RE: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice Linda van den Brink
• RE: W3C RDF Data Cube dimensions definition andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice Phil Archer
• Agenda SSN meeting this week Armin Haller
• Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice Jeremy Tandy
• BP document is FROZEN pending vote to release next WD Jeremy Tandy
• Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice Ed Parsons
• Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice Jeremy Tandy
• Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice Ed Parsons
• RE: Delft attendance - pls fill in the wiki andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu
• Delft attendance - pls fill in the wiki Phil Archer
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Maxime Lefrançois
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Kerry Taylor
• RE: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Kerry Taylor
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : Kerry Taylor
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Armin Haller
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Rob Atkinson
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Rob Atkinson
• RE: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Kerry Taylor
• Re: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Kerry Taylor
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Kerry Taylor
• Re: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Armin Haller
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Armin Haller
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Kerry Taylor
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Armin Haller
• RE: issue-145 ssn time Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• No need to import SKOS - was RE: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Sunday, 5 February 2017

• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Rob Atkinson
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) : issue-87 only Kerry Taylor
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Krzysztof Janowicz
• ssn -- and use case work to be done request for help Kerry Taylor
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Maxime Lefrançois
• RE: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Kerry Taylor
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Kerry Taylor
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Kerry Taylor
• RE: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Kerry Taylor
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Krzysztof Janowicz
• RE: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Kerry Taylor
• RE: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Kerry Taylor

Saturday, 4 February 2017

• Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice Jeremy Tandy
• issue-145 ssn time Kerry Taylor
• Re: tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Krzysztof Janowicz
• tidying ssn -- are you ok with? Kerry Taylor

Friday, 3 February 2017

• A few issues and questions about SOSA, and a very nice picture ! Maxime Lefrançois
• OWL-Time: new Working Draft published yesterday Francois Daoust
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Phil Archer
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Rob Atkinson
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Phil Archer
• Re: Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Phil Archer
• RE: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice Linda van den Brink
• Re: [BP] Progress of the Best Practice Jeremy Tandy
• Re: W3C RDF Data Cube dimensions definition Jon Blower
• RE: W3C RDF Data Cube dimensions definition Linda van den Brink
• [BP] Progress of the Best Practice Linda van den Brink
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action: NEW FORWARD PLAN PROPOSED Armin Haller
• Re: units of measure - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations Rob Atkinson
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Kerry Taylor
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action: NEW FORWARD PLAN PROPOSED Kerry Taylor

Thursday, 2 February 2017

• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Armin Haller
• Point of objection RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Kerry Taylor
• RE: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: units of measure - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file Rob H Warren
• W3C RDF Data Cube dimensions definition Little, Chris
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Maxime Lefrançois
• RE: units of measure - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations Kerry Taylor
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Kerry Taylor
• RE: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Kerry Taylor
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Raúl García Castro
• Re: State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Raphaël Troncy
• Re: units of measure - was RE: Comments on the SOSA and SSN implementations Maxime Lefrançois
• RE: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file Svensson, Lars
• Re: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file Francois Daoust
• State of SSN: arguments in favour of a single name and namespace, proposal, the SEAS example, proposal of action Maxime Lefrançois
• Re: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file Ghislain Atemezing
• RE: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file Francois Daoust
• [minutes] SDW BP call - 2017-02-01 Francois Daoust
• [minutes] SDW SSN call - 2017-01-31 Francois Daoust
• RE: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration Kerry Taylor
• RE: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration Kerry Taylor
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration Rob Atkinson
• RE: State of SSN: comment on namespaces and urls Kerry Taylor
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration Rob Atkinson
• Re: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file Rob Atkinson
• RE: OWL-Time - ISSUE-65: General purpose temporal predicates Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Rob Atkinson
• RE: OWL-Time - ISSUE-65: General purpose temporal predicates Simon.Cox@csiro.au

Wednesday, 1 February 2017

• RE: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• RE: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Armin Haller
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration Joshua Lieberman
• RE: State of SSN and josh's thoughts re modules and namespaces Kerry Taylor
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration Rob Atkinson
• RE: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Simon.Cox@csiro.au
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Rob Atkinson
• Re: State of SSN: comment on namespaces and urls Rob Atkinson
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Joshua Lieberman
• Fwd: Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Phil Archer
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Joshua Lieberman
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Phil Archer
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Joshua Lieberman
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Phil Archer
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Krzysztof Janowicz
• Re: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file Ghislain Atemezing
• Re: Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Scott Simmons
• OWL-Time - questions on Turtle file Francois Daoust
• Proposals (was Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration) Phil Archer
• Re: State of SSN: comment on namespaces and urls Joshua Lieberman
• Re: State of SSN and josh's thoughts re modules and namespaces Joshua Lieberman
• Re: State of SSN: comment on namespaces and urls Francois Daoust
• Re: BP subgroup call: february 1 16:00 UTC Scott Simmons
• RE: BP subgroup call: february 1 16:00 UTC Svensson, Lars
• RE: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration Kerry Taylor
• RE: State of SSN: comment on namespaces and urls Kerry Taylor
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration (let's have a better idea of what's at risk or not). Laurent Lefort
• RE: State of SSN and josh's thoughts re modules and namespaces Kerry Taylor
• Re: State of SSN: comment on namespaces and urls Armin Haller
• RE: State of SSN: comment on namespaces and urls Kerry Taylor
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration Rob Atkinson
• Re: Architecture of SOSA/SSN integration Krzysztof Janowicz

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 February 2017 23:46:52 UTC