W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > October 2016

Coverage note we are working on

From: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:29:45 +0000
To: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
CC: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <PS1PR06MB1740590715F18FB2AF06F32CA4AB0@PS1PR06MB1740.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Jeremy & Linda,
The Note for coverage using the rdf datacube is humming along. Could you give us a little bit of advice please? From an ontology perspective it is a "how to" supported  by an extended example (and there will also be  info on implementation via middleware to come).  The question is that , so far, we mention the "user" as the poor soul responsible for doing the modelling/rdf markup/annotation... To be more consistent with BP, what name would you give? Similarly  what do we call someone who is retrieving data?

Also we are writing examples in turtle--- is that "best practice" for spatial data on the web? Or at least not inconsistent?

The draft so far  is here if you want to look : http://w3c.github.io/sdw/eo-qb/. It uses owl-time and ssn in the same example (plus some prov-o too),  so possibly could even serve as a best-practice example for something if that is not too  internal (although the running software might be a better reference than the Note). Maybe for linkability --- tiles  and slices have uris.

Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2016 13:30:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:26 UTC