W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > October 2016

Re: Publications request for 2 NOTES

From: Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:24:56 +0400
To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Webmaster <webreq@w3.org>
Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Frans Knibbe | Geodan <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Payam Barnaghi <p.barnaghi@surrey.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <c8ca2b6e-90ae-6384-8ab1-ade1c41476d1@w3.org>
Hi,

The documents have been published on http://www.w3.org/TR/.

Regards,

Denis

On 10/21/2016 12:22 PM, Phil Archer wrote:
> This is a publication request for two WG Notes from the Spatial Data on
> the Web WG. The desired publication date is Tuesday 24th.
> 
> Spatial Data on the Web Use Cases & Requirements
> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-sdw-ucr-20161024/
> 
> Record of resolution to publish:
> https://www.w3.org/2016/10/19-sdw-minutes#resolution03
> 
> This is expected to be the last iteration of this document.
> 
> Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices
> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-sdw-bp-20161024/
> 
> Record of resolution to publish:
> https://www.w3.org/2016/10/19-sdw-minutes#resolution04
> 
> Several further iterations of this document are expected.
> 
> Both of these documents currently sit in the Data on the Web bucket -
> which is fine, but they could also be listed under Geospatial.
> 
> As discussed, these are joint publications with OGC so that the logos
> and copyright notices differ from the W3C norm. In all other respects,
> both docs appear to pass pubrules and have been link and validity
> checked (warning - the link checker takes about 7 minutes to work
> through the best practices doc!).
> 
> I will write to Maria/comms separately with homepage news wording.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2016 08:25:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 October 2016 08:25:19 UTC