AAAAAGHHHHHHH I am such an idiot. Will do. On 21/10/2016 09:50, Denis Ah-Kang wrote: > Hi Phil, > > > > On 10/21/2016 10:22 AM, Phil Archer wrote: >> This is a publication request for two WG Notes from the Spatial Data on >> the Web WG. The desired publication date is Tuesday 24th. > > Tuesday will be the 25th :-( > I'm sorry ask you that but can you move the 2 notes > to '*-20161025'? > > Denis > > >> >> Spatial Data on the Web Use Cases & Requirements >> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-sdw-ucr-20161024/ >> >> Record of resolution to publish: >> https://www.w3.org/2016/10/19-sdw-minutes#resolution03 >> >> This is expected to be the last iteration of this document. >> >> Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices >> https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-sdw-bp-20161024/ >> >> Record of resolution to publish: >> https://www.w3.org/2016/10/19-sdw-minutes#resolution04 >> >> Several further iterations of this document are expected. >> >> Both of these documents currently sit in the Data on the Web bucket - >> which is fine, but they could also be listed under Geospatial. >> >> As discussed, these are joint publications with OGC so that the logos >> and copyright notices differ from the W3C norm. In all other respects, >> both docs appear to pass pubrules and have been link and validity >> checked (warning - the link checker takes about 7 minutes to work >> through the best practices doc!). >> >> I will write to Maria/comms separately with homepage news wording. >> >> Thanks >> >> Phil >> >> > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1Received on Friday, 21 October 2016 08:58:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:26 UTC