W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > November 2016

Re: [Minutes-COV] 2016-11-23

From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 22:08:57 +0000
Message-ID: <CACfF9Lw=fO9asHvyywdxXR-=EFYz2fMyN0MuD-EQhZ+sjXLScw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
done: updated (in git ) OGC doc number (have reserved a doc number via the
OGC portal) and cleaned up a couple of issues.

Reviewing open issues - these are largely questions of:
1) being consistent across notes in terms of BP for referencing and
encoding geometries, CRS etc.
2) extending examples once the initial structure and sanity check is
complete.
3) Review regarding what, if any, Time based abstract dimensions we want to
make first class citizens in the ontology - at the moment we simply have a
classification based on the range being bound to an element from Time....
possibly we want to be able to make a stronger statement about the types of
operations that the specific type of time element supports?

Rob


On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 08:09 Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:

> A small group of us got together for what became in informal chat
> loosely based on the coverages work. No formal resolutions were taken
> but a record of the meeting is at
> https://www.w3.org/2016/11/23-sdwcov-minutes
>
> Thanks to Kerry, Chris and Rob.
>
> Phil
>
>
> --
>
>
> Phil Archer
> Data Strategist, W3C
> http://www.w3.org/
>
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755 <+44%207887%20767755>
> @philarcher1
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2016 22:09:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:27 UTC