Re: Joint SDW paper

OK I have done an edit..


On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 at 09:56 Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au> wrote:

> Agree. Rob, you can just edit the Google Doc. It has great version control
> and Linda or someone driving the document can always revert back to earlier
> versions.
>
>
>
> *From: *Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
> *Date: *Tuesday, 22 November 2016 at 8:00 am
> *To: *Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Armin Haller <
> armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <
> public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Re: Joint SDW paper
>
>
>
>
>
> Here's a first volley
>
>
>
> was looking at the abstract which starts
>
> " In the past, in the Geospatial sector we used to refer to specialised
> sources, services and datasets to access spatial data. However, nowadays
> spatial data has become so ubiquitous that we no longer think about it as
> anything special. Online maps, location-based services, and cyber-physical
> services are now common systems and solutions using and/or providing
> spatial data on the Web."
>
>
>
> and i felt it was putting the audience message fairly firmly into the
> traditional geospatial sector, whereas i think its two purposes - 1) to
> advise the geospatial sector about web BP, but equally to advise the
> broader Web audience about geospatial (and temporal!) matters, and why some
> consistency of practice is required.
>
>
>
> A second take at this opening (which may require throwing away in turn but
> tries to get that balance in scope ):
>
> "The world is creating an ever richer set of information resources online,
> and using these for more and more applications. This trend means denser and
> finer-grained spatial and temporal characterisations of data, and many of
> the simple approaches for "loose" location in space and time will need to
> be updated to support domains such as the "Internet of Things". Guiding an
> autonomous vehicle to a precise parking spot near a facility that has a
> time-bounded service - for example booking a charging spot, needs more than
> a GPS coordinate (whose accuracy may be only 100m or so), and a time
> without a specified timezone for example. The geospatial community concerns
> itself with such matters, an in turn needs guidance for how best to express
> these details in the Web. "
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 at 00:00 Linda van den Brink <
> l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> wrote:
>
> Hi Armin,
>
>
>
> Well, I don’t want to be too restrictive, in my book anyone who is active
> in the SDW group and wants to contribute something to the paper is welcome!
> We’ll see how it goes with 16 or 17 authors (so far, with you included).
>
>
>
> Linda
>
>
>
> *Van:* Armin Haller [mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au]
> *Verzonden:* maandag 21 november 2016 06:05
> *Aan:* Linda van den Brink; SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)
>
>
> *Onderwerp:* Re: Joint SDW paper
>
>
>
> Hi Linda,
>
>
>
> I’m not active in the BP group either, but, I would be happy to
> contribute. However, seeing from the vast response, there may already be
> too many cooks in the kitchen. Maybe you want to restrict the author list
> to the people who made commits to the BP document (which would exclude me).
> That could potentially be a best practice for future articles based on
> other deliverables of the working group, although not a perfect measure, of
> course.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Armin
>
>
>
> *From: *Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
> *Date: *Thursday 17 November 2016 at 09:08
> *To: *"SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> *Cc: *Payam Barnaghi <payam.barnaghi@gmail.com>, "Jeremy Tandy (
> jeremy.tandy@gmail.com)" <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
> *Subject: *Joint SDW paper
> *Resent-From: *<public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Thursday 17 November 2016 at 09:08
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> As I announced at the very end of the telecon yesterday, I’m preparing a
> paper about the SDW BP. Payam and I prepared an abstract and TOC, and want
> to try getting it published in Semantic Web Journal. Of course the work
> we’ll be writing about is done by all of you, so I want to list as many of
> you as possible as co-authors. I even started adding everyone on
> https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=75471&public=1 but there’s
> about fifty names there…
>
>
>
> So what I want to do is at least list the BP editors; followed by any
> participant in this group who tells me they want to be listed as author and
> contribute something. A contribution could be actually writing a bit of
> text for the paper, or reviewing (a section of) the paper, participate in
> discussions on the paper, give some input for the paper, or just having
> been active on the BP work in this group.
>
>
>
> In addition we’ll put an acknowledgement in the paper (a first draft of
> that is already in the abstract). But I really don’t want anyone to feel
> left out so _*please*_ don’t hesitate to let me know if you want to be
> listed as an author! Just a reply with a simple ‘yes’ is enough.
>
>
>
> The abstract of the paper is here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CAtrBt1P8TMtZDrZYU2Q9-RmtzeWxwl-iEMFfLn2uqg/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
>
> Linda and Payam
>
>