Re: F2F agenda updates, regrets for next 2 weeks and promises of business in December

ditto - Thanksgiving week is tough for meetings in the US (and my kids are demanding that I take them skiing on Wednesday).

Scott

> On Nov 21, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Linda - suits me as I was also going to have to send regrets for this week.
> 
> Bill
> 
> On 21 November 2016 at 14:38, Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com <mailto:eparsons@google.com>> wrote:
> Sounds good to me was going to have to send regrets anyway..
> 
> Ed
> 
> 
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 at 14:32 Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl <mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
>  
> 
> Does anyone have anything to discuss in the BP subgroup call this week? Any progress, questions, things for consideration?
> 
>  
> 
> Otherwise I will cancel the call as I don’t have time to prepare anything myself this week… Better to spend the one hour I have on the BP itself…
> 
>  
> 
> Linda
> 
>  
> 
> Van: Jeremy Tandy [mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com <mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>] 
> Verzonden: zaterdag 19 november 2016 09:58
> Aan: SDW WG Public List
> Onderwerp: F2F agenda updates, regrets for next 2 weeks and promises of business in December
> 
>  
> 
> Hi.
> 
>  
> 
> I will be travelling for work in Asia over the next 2-weeks; totally the wrong time-zone for our weekly meetings so I will miss the next BP sib-group call and the plenary call the week after. Apologies.
> 
>  
> 
> I also won't be able to do any work (other than thinking!) about the BP deliverable. Apologies (again!).
> 
>  
> 
> I've updated the F2F agenda for December. I've added 15-minutes for the vote to release the next WD of the Best Practices Note on Friday morning (10:45-11:00) as agreed. I've also suggested that BP could usefully fill the 'unclaimed' session from 9:00am to 10:45am on Friday morning to work through prioritise BPs.
> 
>  
> 
> When I get back to the UK, I _promise_ that I will take the discussions from TPAC and recent BP calls about BP 7 [1] "Use globally unique HTTP identifiers for spatial things" (including our discussion on use of "indirect identifiers") and BP 4 [2] "Make your spatial data indexable by search engines" ... these changes _will_ make it into the next WD release!
> 
>  
> 
> Back in a couple of weeks. Jeremy
> 
>  
> 
> [1]: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#globally-unique-ids <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#globally-unique-ids> 
> 
> [2]: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#indexable-by-search-engines <http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/#indexable-by-search-engines> 
> 
>  
> 
> -- 
> Ed Parsons FRGS
> Geospatial Technologist, Google
> 
> Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 <tel:%2B44%20%280%2920%207881%204501>
> www.edparsons.com <http://www.edparsons.com/> @edparsons
> 
> 

Received on Monday, 21 November 2016 15:27:44 UTC