- From: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:21:10 +0100
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>, Clemens Portele <portele@interactive-instruments.de>, "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>, Jon Blower <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
Dear all, The video recording of the SDW Workshop is now available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TS6pGuJR00 I've also updated the wiki page accordingly: https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SDW_Workshop_@_INSPIRE_2016#Presentation_.26_minutes Cheers, Andrea On 30/09/2016 13:21, Ed Parsons wrote: > Slides are here > ...https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/14HR4tM14FsntP_1ylTn4kw1Y00v3emzRYrpWFLHMo7U/edit?usp=drive_web > > Ed > > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016, 12:42 Clemens Portele, > <portele@interactive-instruments.de > <mailto:portele@interactive-instruments.de>> wrote: > > All, > > this morning we had the 90 minutes workshop "W3C/OGC Spatial Data on > the Web Working Group" at the INSPIRE Conference 2016 > (http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016). This > is a brief summary of the (good) discussion and feedback we got. I > tried to capture the main points, but for sure I will have failed, > so amendments and corrections are very welcome :) > > Ed, is there a link to the slides that you have shown? > > We had about 30 attendees. Ed gave an introduction to the working > group and its deliverables. The discussion focussed on the Best > Practice deliverable as discussed at TPAC. > > TOPIC: Target audience > - Web developers and publishers of data, practioneers > - General agreement in the audience > > TOPIC: SDI and the rest > - Need to go beyond SDIs to reach the target audience, the other 99% > - Robin Smith, JRC: Needs to be done responsibly to avoid that > something like another SDI is created. > - Ed: Agreed, it is important not to reinvent the wheel > - Markus Jobst, AT: Need the "middleware" to make it work > - Jandirk Bules, NL: (not recorded) > - Erwin Folmer, NL: need to target the data providers to make sure > we can serve the other 99% > > TOPIC: Spatial things, features and geometry > - Different terminology used outside of the GI community > - The lighthouse example > - "Feature" typically understood as a capability of a software > - It is also more blurred whether we talk about a digital > abstraction or the real-world entity > - Joeri Robbrect, DG ENV: agrees > - Markus Jobst, AT: Feels a bit like reinventing the wheel > - Robin Smith, JRC: Education is required, but "spatial things" is > good because it captures peoples attention > - Hugo de Groof, DG ENV: Why not just use "object"? > - Alex Ramage, UK: Defnition needs to be clear > > TOPIC: BP7 - Use persistent HTTP identifiers > - Robin Smith, JRC: Context is important, requires understanding of > what change means, when does the thing needs a new identifier > - Ed: A key aspect is that there is a URI for each identifier > - Alex Ramage, UK: Agrees with Robin, e.g. road feature split into > parts will receive new identifiers > - Clemens: The BP is conceptually consistent with INSPIREs support > for persistent identifiers. It mainly is a challenge for those that > do not yet manage persistent identifiers and/or to run > the infrastructure to resolve feature URIs > - Joeri Robbrect, DG ENV: Key is a resolvable identifier that > follows the life-cycle of the object > - Markus Jobst, AT: When I move the lighthouse or change it to a > chapel, does it get a new identifier? > - Jandirk Bulens, NL: Different function -> new thing -> new identifier > - Straw poll: 50% in the room are responsible for publishing, half > of them working with HTTP URIs > > TOPIC: BP4 - Make data indexable by search engines > - Is it practicable? No comment from the audience. > - Is it understood? > - Erwin Folmer, NL: More than just an HTML page is needed > (annotations etc) > - Robin Smith, JRC: Geoportals still have their place, where they > add value and organise the content > - Ed: BPs should be done/doable in addition to current practice of > the GI community > - Joeri Robbrect, DG ENV: A good approach, goes beyond the current > metadata approach in SDIs; need to clarify how it works with, e.g., > coverages > - Clemens: The search engines also need to clarify how a large > number of features should be published so that they will make them > discoverable > > TOPIC: BP8 - Provide geometries in a usable way > - Alex Ramage, UK: Support the CRS "you" need or "they" (the users) > need. Rather "they"? > - Joeri Robbrect, DG ENV: Encoding is always confusing, GeoJSON, > JSON-LD, CovJSON. Which encoding to use? On the CRS: ETRS89 vs Web > Mercator > - Jandirk Bulens, NL: Use what the community has already specified > and uses > - Clemens: DWBP has recommendation to support multiple encodings, > where feasible. CRS: WGS84 most commonly expected/assumed, but also > native CRS should be published, often the national CRS > > TOPIC: BP10 - Spatial semantics for spatial things > - Robin Smith, JRC: What is the "best" vocabulary? Examples? Impact > on interoperability? > - Joeri Robbrect, DG ENV: Points to the ISA Core Location Vocabulary > - Clemens: ISA Core Location Vocabulary identifies what is a > geometry, but not which vocabulary to use. Could be amended in the > future with recommendations, if there is a proper best practice > - Jandirk Bulens, NL: Topological relationships are important > - Clemens: Yes, current idea to agree on a list of spatial and > temporal relationships and register them with IANA > - NN: What is the value of publishing spatial data on the web? Value > is with publishing objects that are of interest (to the domain). It > is different whether you publish data or something that answers > a question. > > TOPIC: List of BPs > - Can we identify priorities? Anything not on the list? Anything > unclear? > - Martin Tuchyňa, SK: There is pressure to have the link to > e-government, using linked data. Guidance where to start and where > to end is needed. The was a project providing recommendations > on this. maybe the BPs could describe a list of steps to be taken. > - Joeri Robbrect, DG ENV: Add BP to publish multiple encodings > - Clemens: DWBP covers this, not shown here but is referenced > - Roberto Lucchi, Esri: Most BP titels are not really "spatial", > which other communities have been successful with these practices? > - Erwin Folmer, NL: Two additional BPs: a) How to reuse existing > infrastructure, easy steps for data providers. b) Queries are > important, but unclear how to query distributed data holdings on > the web since there are different APIs (SPARQL, etc). > - Robin Smith, JRC: BP14 (publish links to related resources) is key > for creating value for the 99% > - Alex Ramage, UK: Data user could quickly become a data publisher > to someone else. > > Ed closed the workshop with a call to read look at the wiki, read > the document and send comments! > > >> On 28 Sep 2016, at 17:04, Andrea Perego >> <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu >> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>> wrote: >> >> Dears, >> >> All going well, we'll have the video recording of the workshop, >> which can be used to complement possible gaps in the minutes. >> >> BTW, for those who may be interested, the video recording of the >> SDW WG workshop at INSPIRE 2014 is available here: >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8P02vocsKks >> >> Starring (in alphabetical order): >> - Alex Coley >> - Bart De Lathouwer >> - Ed Parsons >> - Phil Archer >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Andrea >> >> >> On 28/09/2016 14:58, Tandy, Jeremy wrote: >>> I agree. Jeremy >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>> Jeremy Tandy | Technology Fellow >>> *Met Office*, Fitzroy Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 3PB, United Kingdom >>> email: jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk >>> <mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> >>> <mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> | >>> web: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/> >>> >>> /See our guide to climate change >>> at/ http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate >>> change/guide/ >>> >>> On 28 Sep 2016, at 13:54, Clemens Portele >>> <portele@interactive-instruments.de >>> <mailto:portele@interactive-instruments.de> >>> <mailto:portele@interactive-instruments.de>> wrote: >>> >>>> IRC makes sense during a meeting, but in this case I think capturing >>>> the feedback in an email to the list should be sufficient? >>>> >>>> Clemens >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 28 Sep 2016, at 14:49, Tandy, Jeremy >>>>> <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk >>>>> <mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> >>>>> <mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Notes / IRC sound good to me. Basically - if you collect (valuable) >>>>> input for the BP doc, we editors need to know what that is. If the >>>>> input comes from a specific person / organisation it would be >>>>> good to >>>>> ask if we could follow up later to clarify ... so please get >>>>> contact >>>>> details :-) >>>>> >>>>> J >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________________________________ >>>>> Jeremy Tandy | Technology Fellow >>>>> *Met Office*, Fitzroy Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 3PB, United Kingdom >>>>> email: jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk >>>>> <mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> >>>>> <mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> | web: >>>>> http://www.metoffice.gov.uk >>>>> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/> >>>>> >>>>> /See our guide to climate change at/ >>>>> http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climate change/guide/ >>>>> >>>>> On 28 Sep 2016, at 13:47, Andrea Perego >>>>> <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu >>>>> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu> >>>>> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> ' Thanks, Ed. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think that notes would be perfectly fine - and maybe they can be >>>>>> logged in the IRC (wifi permitting). >>>>>> >>>>>> But maybe Linda and Jeremy have different preferences. >>>>>> >>>>>> Andrea >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 28/09/2016 11:27, Ed Parsons wrote: >>>>>>> Thanks Guys, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Looks Good, how would you like the feedback collected ? >>>>>>> Should we just >>>>>>> take notes or would you like something more structured ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Clemens, I'm happy to MC the session if you want to collect the >>>>>>> feedback ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ed >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 at 09:58 Andrea Perego >>>>>>> <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu >>>>>>> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu> >>>>>>> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu> >>>>>>> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear Ed, all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As agreed in Lisbon, we drafted a programme for the SDW >>>>>>> Workshop >>>>>>> at the >>>>>>> INSPIRE 2016 conference, which is now available on the WG wiki: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SDW_Workshop_@_INSPIRE_2016#Background_.26_purpose_of_workshop >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Because of time constraints (1.5h), the idea is to focus the >>>>>>> discussion >>>>>>> on the BP deliverable, in particular on those BPs we see as >>>>>>> most >>>>>>> relevant to the audience (these are listed in the wiki page). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We think it would be relevant to get feedback both from the >>>>>>> people >>>>>>> already doing "spatial data on the Web" (do the BPs provide >>>>>>> a good >>>>>>> enough coverage of the issues they had to face and the >>>>>>> solutions >>>>>>> they >>>>>>> adopted?), and those who plan to do them (do the BPs >>>>>>> provide clear >>>>>>> enough guidance on how to do that?) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The idea is also to explain that we're trying to "crack >>>>>>> open" their >>>>>>> datasets, so that each individual "data item" (spatial >>>>>>> thing) is >>>>>>> addressable in the Web's information space. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you think this make sense? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The wiki page includes also a tentative agenda. Probably, >>>>>>> to get >>>>>>> feedback in a more effective way, it would good to have >>>>>>> break out >>>>>>> sessions on the selected BPs, but I don't know if this is >>>>>>> feasible, and >>>>>>> it probably depends on how many people will join the workshop. >>>>>>> When we >>>>>>> had the SDW workshop at INSPIRE 2014 in Aalborg, we had >>>>>>> around 150 >>>>>>> people attending, and this year we have around 1,000 >>>>>>> participants at the >>>>>>> INSPIRE conference (more than in 2014). However, since the >>>>>>> workshop is >>>>>>> on Friday, we may have a smaller audience. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Linda, Jeremy and Andrea >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 05/08/2016 15:07, Andrea Perego wrote: >>>>>>>> Dear colleagues, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is to let you know that the SDW workshop proposal for >>>>>>>> INSPIRE >>>>>>> 2016 >>>>>>>> has been accepted, and it is scheduled on Friday, Sep, 30th, >>>>>>>> at 9AM: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/page/wsl >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 10/06/2016 15:58, Andrea Perego wrote: >>>>>>>>> Thanks, Clemens. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This being the situation, probably we should consider >>>>>>>>> having an oral >>>>>>>>> presentation, in case it won't be actually possible to run a >>>>>>> workshop. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Meanwhile, I submitted a draft proposal. I include below >>>>>>>>> the relevant >>>>>>>>> parts for you to review. Please change it as you see fit. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> WORKSHOP PROPOSAL >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> TITLE: W3C/OGC Spatial Data on the Web Working Group >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ABSTRACT: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Spatial Data on the Web Working Group (SDW WG) is a joint >>>>>>> initiative >>>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>>> World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and the Open Geospatial >>>>>>> Consortium (OGC) >>>>>>>>> aiming >>>>>>>>> to bridge the geospatial technologies and the Web, thus >>>>>>> facilitating the >>>>>>>>> publication and use of spatial data across platforms and >>>>>>>>> communities. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In order to achieve this, the SDW WG is working on a set of >>>>>>>>> deliverables, described in the WG Charter >>>>>>>>> (https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/charter), covering best >>>>>>> practices for >>>>>>>>> the publication of spatial data on the Web, based on >>>>>>>>> identified use >>>>>>>>> cases and requirements, plus the standardisation of a set of >>>>>>> ontologies >>>>>>>>> (Time Ontology, Semantic Sensor Network Vocabulary, >>>>>>>>> Coverages in >>>>>>>>> Linked Data). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The workshop is meant to illustrate the work done so far, by >>>>>>> providing >>>>>>>>> an overview of the current version of the deliverables, and to >>>>>>> collect >>>>>>>>> feedback from participants on the proposed solutions and >>>>>>>>> open issues. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> AGENDA: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - Introduction & purpose of the workshop >>>>>>>>> - Background and objectives of the SDW WG >>>>>>>>> - Overview of SDW WG deliverables >>>>>>>>> - Breakout sessions >>>>>>>>> - Summary from breakout sessions & conclusions >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 09/06/2016 19:09, Clemens Portele wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Andrea, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> while I will likely be in Barcelona on Tuesday and Friday >>>>>>> morning, do >>>>>>>>>> not make the planning dependent on me. There are other >>>>>>> submissions that >>>>>>>>>> I am involved in and I expect to be already quite busy during >>>>>>> the week. >>>>>>>>>> If I do not have a session conflict I will attend the >>>>>>>>>> workshop and >>>>>>>>>> contribute to the discussion as good as possible, but >>>>>>>>>> right now >>>>>>> I cannot >>>>>>>>>> commit to a more active role. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>> Clemens >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 9 June 2016 at 15:24:41, Andrea Perego >>>>>>>>>> (andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu> >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu> >>>>>>> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu> >>>>>>> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu >>>>>>> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>>) >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jon, Clemens, Ed, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your mails! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So, the preference for the workshop would be: >>>>>>>>>>> - 1st choice: Friday (morning?), 1.5 hours >>>>>>>>>>> - 2nd choice: Tuesday morning, 1.5 hours >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> @Jon, @Clemens, would both dates suit you well? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> About the agenda, I wonder what you think should be included. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Just trying a possible outline: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - Introduction to SDW WG & purpose of the workshop >>>>>>>>>>> - Overview of deliverables >>>>>>>>>>> - Breakout sessions on selected topics from BP / UCR & SDW >>>>>>> ontologies >>>>>>>>>>> - Summary of breakout sessions & conclusions >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Covering all the deliverables in 1.5 hours is probably too >>>>>>> much, but >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> agenda & the discussion topics could be refined based on the >>>>>>>>>>> outcomes of >>>>>>>>>>> the f2f at the TPAC. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Does this make sense to you? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 09/06/2016 10:17, Ed Parsons wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> HI Andrea, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I can be there with a probability of 1.0 on the 30th, >>>>>>>>>>>> 0.7 on the >>>>>>>>>>> 27th, >>>>>>>>>>>> 0.1 on the 26th ! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ed >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 at 21:57 Jon Blower >>>>>>> <j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk >>>>>>> <mailto:j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk> <mailto:j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk> >>>>>>> <mailto:j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk> >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk >>>>>>> <mailto:j.d.blower@reading.ac.uk>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I will probably be there (75% confidence level), but not all >>>>>>> week. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>> Jon >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8 Jun 2016, at 20:50, Andrea Perego >>>>>>>>>>>> <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu> >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu> >>>>>>> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu> >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu >>>>>>> <mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> During today's call [1], we briefly discussed the option of >>>>>>>>>>>> submitting a workshop proposal to INSPIRE 2016, >>>>>>>>>>>> considering also >>>>>>>>>>>> that this would be an opportunity to get feedback on the new >>>>>>>>>>>> versions of the deliverables. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> May I ask you who from the WG plans to be at the INSPIRE >>>>>>>>>>>> conference? According to the draft programme [2], time slots >>>>>>> for the >>>>>>>>>>>> workshops are 1.5 hour, and are scheduled on Monday (26th), >>>>>>> Tuesday >>>>>>>>>>>> morning (27th), and Friday (30th). >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NB: I kindly ask you to let me know ASAP, since the >>>>>>> deadline for >>>>>>>>>>>> submission if this Friday. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]https://www.w3.org/2016/06/08-sdw-minutes#item04 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> [2]http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/page/ovw >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/06/2016 10:37, Andrea Perego wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Kerry. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to add another item to the agenda, following >>>>>>> up from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.w3.org/2016/05/11-sdw-minutes#item02 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you know, the INSPIRE conference this year will be in >>>>>>>>>>> Barcelona, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> right after the W3C TPAC: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We (JRC) think it would be good to present the work done >>>>>>> by the >>>>>>>>>>>> SDW WG, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and collect feedback. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I wonder whether we can devote 5 minutes to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discuss the >>>>>>>>>>>> possibility >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of proposing a workshop during today's call. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The deadline for submission is quite close (June, 10th), >>>>>>> but we >>>>>>>>>>> just >>>>>>>>>>>>>> need a short abstract (max 400 words) and filling in a >>>>>>> template >>>>>>>>>>> [1]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1]http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/events/conferences/inspire_2016/Workshop_template_2016.doc >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 07/06/2016 14:20, Kerry Taylor wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> G’day, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The full SDW meeting this week will be held at the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usual time >>>>>>>>>>>> and place: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *8 June 2016 13:00 GMT >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=SDWWG+Call&iso=20160608T13&p1=1440&ah=1>* >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Agenda: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. ISSUE-18 model reuse >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/18> and >>>>>>> ISSUE-19 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Multiple types of coverage >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/19> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Related >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actions (ACTION-114 and ACTION-115) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. ISSUE-32 Independence of reference systems >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/32> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. F2F meeting plan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings#TPAC_2015.2C_Lisbon> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. UCR completion >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. Spatial ontology: next steps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More details and dial-in instructions: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20160608 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --Kerry & Ed >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea Perego, Ph.D. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Scientific / Technical Project Officer >>>>>>>>>>>>> European Commission DG JRC >>>>>>>>>>>>> Institute for Environment & Sustainability >>>>>>>>>>>>> Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data >>>>>>>>>>>>> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 >>>>>>>>>>>>> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Ed Parsons *FRGS >>>>>>>>>>>> Geospatial Technologist, Google >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 <tel:020%207881%204501> >>>>>>>>>>>> <tel:020%207881%204501> >>>>>>>>>>>> www.edparsons.com >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.edparsons.com/> <http://www.edparsons.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.edparsons.com >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.edparsons.com/> <http://www.edparsons.com/>> >>>>>>> <http://www.edparsons.com >>>>>>> <http://www.edparsons.com/> <http://www.edparsons.com/>> >>>>>>> @edparsons >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Andrea Perego, Ph.D. >>>>>>>>>>> Scientific / Technical Project Officer >>>>>>>>>>> European Commission DG JRC >>>>>>>>>>> Institute for Environment & Sustainability >>>>>>>>>>> Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data >>>>>>>>>>> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 >>>>>>>>>>> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Andrea Perego, Ph.D. >>>>>>> Scientific / Technical Project Officer >>>>>>> European Commission DG JRC >>>>>>> Directorate B - Growth and Innovation >>>>>>> Unit B6 - Digital Economy >>>>>>> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 >>>>>>> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ---- >>>>>>> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may >>>>>>> not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official >>>>>>> position of the European Commission. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Ed Parsons *FRGS >>>>>>> Geospatial Technologist, Google >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 <tel:020%207881%204501> >>>>>>> <tel:%2B44%20%280%2920%207881%204501> >>>>>>> www.edparsons.com >>>>>>> <http://www.edparsons.com/> <http://www.edparsons.com/> >>>>>>> <http://www.edparsons.com/> @edparsons >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Andrea Perego, Ph.D. >>>>>> Scientific / Technical Project Officer >>>>>> European Commission DG JRC >>>>>> Directorate B - Growth and Innovation >>>>>> Unit B6 - Digital Economy >>>>>> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 >>>>>> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy >>>>>> >>>>>> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ >>>>>> >>>>>> ---- >>>>>> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may >>>>>> not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official >>>>>> position of the European Commission. >>>>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> Andrea Perego, Ph.D. >> Scientific / Technical Project Officer >> European Commission DG JRC >> Directorate B - Growth and Innovation >> Unit B6 - Digital Economy >> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 >> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy >> >> https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ >> >> ---- >> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may >> not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official >> position of the European Commission. > > -- > > *Ed Parsons *FRGS > Geospatial Technologist, Google > > Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 <tel:%2B44%20%280%2920%207881%204501> > www.edparsons.com <http://www.edparsons.com/> @edparsons > -- Andrea Perego, Ph.D. Scientific / Technical Project Officer European Commission DG JRC Directorate B - Growth and Innovation Unit B6 - Digital Economy Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 21027 Ispra VA, Italy https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ ---- The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.
Received on Monday, 7 November 2016 14:21:40 UTC