- From: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 16:01:07 +0200
- To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>, Joshua Lieberman <jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com>
- Cc: "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Dear Linda, dear Frans, dear Josh,
About the agenda item on "spatial ontology", I wonder whether we can
include here a clarification on the notions of spatial object, feature
and geometry in GeoSPARQL - in relation to ISO, and to our discussion on
real-world / spatial things.
In particular:
1. In GeoSPARQL, feature and geometry are explicitly mapped to the
corresponding notions in the relevant ISO standards. However, the
definition of spatial object in GeoSPARQL doesn't seem to match to the
ISO one ("object used for representing a spatial characteristic of a
feature" - ISO 19107).
2. What in GeoSPARQL corresponds to real-world / spatial things?
Thanks
Andrea
On 30/05/2016 10:22, Linda van den Brink wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> The Best Practice sub-group telecon agenda is at
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:BP-Telecon20160601.
>
>
>
> Main agenda:
>
> · Progress of BP Narrative 2
>
> · Spatial ontology
>
>
>
> See you all on Wednesday! (else please advise any regrets).
>
>
>
> Linda
>
--
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Institute for Environment & Sustainability
Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy
https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2016 14:01:56 UTC