W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > May 2016

Re: Agenda for Best Practice sub-group, 14:00UTC 1-June-2016

From: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 16:01:07 +0200
To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>, Joshua Lieberman <jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com>
Cc: "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-id: <a53ffa65-a8ea-1a68-5eb1-6a5523b38fa3@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
Dear Linda, dear Frans, dear Josh,

About the agenda item on "spatial ontology", I wonder whether we can 
include here a clarification on the notions of spatial object, feature 
and geometry in GeoSPARQL - in relation to ISO, and to our discussion on 
real-world / spatial things.

In particular:

1. In GeoSPARQL, feature and geometry are explicitly mapped to the 
corresponding notions in the relevant ISO standards. However, the 
definition of spatial object in GeoSPARQL doesn't seem to match to the 
ISO one ("object used for representing a spatial characteristic of a 
feature" - ISO 19107).

2. What in GeoSPARQL corresponds to real-world / spatial things?

Thanks

Andrea


On 30/05/2016 10:22, Linda van den Brink wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> The Best Practice sub-group telecon agenda is at
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:BP-Telecon20160601.
>
>
>
> Main agenda:
>
> ·         Progress of BP Narrative 2
>
> ·         Spatial ontology
>
>
>
> See you all on Wednesday! (else please advise any regrets).
>
>
>
> Linda
>

-- 
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Institute for Environment & Sustainability
Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2016 14:01:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:21 UTC