Re: How to proceed with work on the spatial ontology task?

Frans I think it is up to you and Josh to suggest a way forward, I would
suggest you focus on a very strict scope of documenting an  ontology based
on that used by GeoSPARQL, perhaps just start with a shared document/wiki
for comment ?

Ed

On Wed, 18 May 2016 at 10:42 Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:

> Dear chairpeople, Josh,
>
> In the teleconference of 2016-04-27
> <https://www.w3.org/2016/04/27-sdw-minutes> we discussed the spatial
> ontology mentioned in the charter as a part of the BP deliverable. Although
> no official actions or resolutions were recorded, we did agree that working
> on this topic was needed, that the work would be separate from work on the
> BP document, that Josh and I would try to take point and that we would take
> the current GeoSPARQL standard as a starting point.
>
> How can we take this forward? Should we first try to form a group of
> interested people? Or should we just start somewhere, for example by making
> a wish list for a next version of GeoSPARQL, and making that interesting
> enough for many people to get involved?
>
> Regards,
> Frans
>
-- 

*Ed Parsons *FRGS
Geospatial Technologist, Google

Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501
www.edparsons.com @edparsons