W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > May 2016

RE: [ssn] rebuild/restructure/redesign/modularise ssn: call for proposals

From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 03:02:12 +0000
To: <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9347b19c57294e12a20a897989af7706@exch1-mel.nexus.csiro.au>
Kerry - this other list was compiled earlier
https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SSN_Wish_List
I suggest working through that first, else merging them.

I'm a bit adrift regarding the process here - you created some structures for input, then appear to be ignoring them and setting up new ones. Am I misunderstanding?

Simon

From: Kerry Taylor [mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au]
Sent: Wednesday, 4 May 2016 8:51 AM
To: public-sdw-wg@w3.org
Subject: [ssn] rebuild/restructure/redesign/modularise ssn: call for proposals

SDW-ers
As discussed (again!) in the meeting today there are several proposals on the table for redesign of the ssn-xg ssn in one way or another. These proposals are variously  called "modularisation", "alignment" , "extension", "simplification", "core" , "skeleton"  etc.  Some are scattered around our wiki already; others have been raised in meetings or briefly on the mailing list  but are not well recorded.

I invite you to submit your proposals by recording them on the wiki page I just created here
https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Proposals_for_rewriting_SSN
and anchored on the wiki main page in the SSN section.

This is intended to give a persistent and written account of the proposals that the meetings can then take on board in well-informed discussions as we move towards a decision. As agreed (again!) in the meeting today this will not be resolved for the FPWD but I hope that a robust and informed discussion can be held *after* the FPWD is published.

There is also a question about whether these proposals should be even  "*mentioned*" in our FPWD. I'm ok with that in the form of a sentence or two marked as an issue. Please feel very free to propose that "sentence" in your proposal too.

Timeline? I am not certain but I imagine this will be the highest priority after the FPWD is published; so maybe a month from now?

--Kerry
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2016 03:03:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:21 UTC