- From: Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:23:13 +0000
- To: Clemens Portele <portele@interactive-instruments.de>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
- Cc: "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHrFjcm1wwnoV-Z3kLPfG9yOhcD+8mq7O2wuRGv303ZgojLjKQ@mail.gmail.com>
This is great,something to read over the weekend ! Many thanks Linda and Clemens Ed On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, 09:14 Clemens Portele, < portele@interactive-instruments.de> wrote: > Thanks, Linda! > > During the Amersfoort meeting I had presented our understanding how the > WFS proxy implementation relates to the current draft best practices and I > promised an update once we have completed our work. Our report has an > updated version of this assessment: > http://geo4web-testbed.github.io/topic4/#h.s1rclqklnkog > > Best regards, > Clemens > > > Am 24.03.2016 um 10:03 schrieb Linda van den Brink < > l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>: > > Hi all, > > The results of the first three research topics of our ‘spatial data on the > web’ testbed have become available as of last week! Because a lot of it is > relevant to this group, I’d like to draw your attention to the reports, > code and presentations coming out of it. > > All the results, presentations and code are available on GitHub: > https://github.com/geo4web-testbed/general > > Three topics were researched: > > - Spatial data platform – the results from this one are I think > less useful to this group. Mainly they used CartoDB as a base, added an > authorization layer for allowing users to propose data modifications, > proposed a way to deal with different CRS, etc. All very user friendly. > - Crawlable spatial data – very relevant, they looked at how to > publish spatial data on the web and the best ways to make it indexable by > search engines and usable for web programmers. Crawlers turned out to be > pretty slow with indexing… Also they tried to start engaging a community > around this topic (of web developers), and intend to keep doing this. > - Proxy on SDI – also very relevant, Clemens Portele was also > involved in this. Basically they also looked at crawlability etc, but with > the starting point of the current SDI –creating a proxy on top of WFS and > CSW services. They also proposed an extension to schema.org, published > sample spatial linked data, and more. > > I think there is potential for take a lot of examples and content for our > BP from these results. > > Thanks to all the participants from Spotzi, Apiwise, interactive > instruments, GeoCAT, and Linked Data Factory! > > Linda > *______________________________________* > *Geonovum* > *Linda van den Brink* > *Adviseur Geo-standaarden* > > *a*: Barchman Wuytierslaan 10, 3818 LH Amersfoort > *p*: Postbus 508, 3800 AM Amersfoort > *t*: + 31 (0)33 46041 00 > *m*: + 31 (0)6 1355 57 92 > *e: *l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl <r.beltman@geonovum.nl> > *i*: www.geonovum.nl > *tw*: @brinkwoman > > > -- *Ed Parsons *FRGS Geospatial Technologist, Google Google Voice +44 (0)20 7881 4501 www.edparsons.com @edparsons
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2016 09:23:53 UTC