- From: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:59:33 +0100
- To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
- Cc: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFVDz41Mj4drO8BJRKZ7ezKwDp0nsqX2xmWje3-NXbdszO8KUw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Linda, Jeremy, On Linda's advice I have added a new BP principle on the BP principles wiki page <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Principles>. I also looked at the current description of audience groups in the current draft of the BP document, with the ultimate goal of being able to close my action conscientiously. I see that currently three target groups are described: - custodians - web developers - content publishers The description of the custodians group confuses me a bit. Custodians are described as people that want to publish data. But isn't that what data/content publishers do? It seems to me the job of custodians is to store and curate data. With the current description, the custodians group seems similar to the content publishers group. Also I would like to repeat a remark I made in Amersfoort. I think that next to web developers and data publishers more potential audiences for the BP document exist. Some that I can think of are: - tool developers (e.g. desktop software that ingests spatial data for analysis, visualization or combination with other data) - data storage developers (e.g triple stores, spatial databases, web caches, ...) - ontologists/information modellers (developers of semantics that make use of semantics for spatiotemporal data) - search engine developers (they need to know how spatial data can be optimally crawled and indexed) Wouldn't it be good to acknowledge and accomodate these audiences too? Regards, Frans 2016-02-25 11:17 GMT+01:00 Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>: > Hi Frans, > > > > Your interpretation looks sensible. I have looked through my personal > notes, but can’t find anything that sheds more light. And I don’t recollect > any more details either. > > > > @Jeremy maybe you do? > > > > The right place to record this would be in the Principles page on the wiki > [1] and from there in the BP’s Introduction section or even the Scope > section. > > > > Linda > > > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Principles > > > > *Van:* Frans Knibbe [mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl] > *Verzonden:* vrijdag 19 februari 2016 16:42 > *Aan:* Jeremy Tandy; Linda van den Brink > *CC:* SDW WG Public List > *Onderwerp:* My action 135 > > > > Hello Jeremy, Linda, > > > > The first day of face to face talks in Amersfoort left me with two action > items. One of those is action-135 > <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/135> and I am having > difficulties understanding what is expected of me now. Since the both of > you were there and because it is about the BP documennt I wonder if you can > help me. > > > > The text is "to write meta requirement that the bp will provide guidance > to spatial data publishing". I don't entirely recollect what we talked > about, even with the minutes. I think the action is about the idea that it > would be nice if the BP document, or a particular subset or crosssection of > it, provides a more or less comprehensive guidance of how to publish > spatial data on the web. Do you agree on that interpretation? Next to that > I wonder what would be the best place to record metarequirements for the > document. > > > > Regards, > > Frans >
Received on Monday, 21 March 2016 15:00:04 UTC