Fwd: Update DWBP Best Practice "Use Standardized terms" - feedback from SDW WG

I'm afraid this message from Antoine didn't pass through our mailing list.

Andrea


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Update DWBP Best Practice "Use Standardized terms" - feedback 
from SDW WG
Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 18:04:13 +0000
Resent-From: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 19:03:36 +0100
From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, public-sdw-wg@w3.org

Dear all,

I've updated the DWBP Best Practice 16 "Use Standardized terms":
http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#MetadataStandardized [3]

I've done some editorial clean up and re-organization of some points 
there. But most importantly I've added examples following the comments 
received from the SDW WG [1] on a previous version of the BP [2].

@DWBP friends: can you have a general check at this?

@SDW: I hope the enhancement alleviate your worried. Thanks again for 
the suggestion! I have a couple of questions though:

1. I hope I captured enough provenance/credentials for the examples I 
used that were contributed in our discussion with SDW. The two reference 
vocabularies that I was pointed to are the result of various projects 
hosted by different institutions, it's not easy to find back the proper 
responsibilities. Please suggest amendments if I've misrepresented the 
context of a linked data publication!

2. A more specific question for these who suggested the GeoLink Schema.
I've used an example with dct:type and then the URI 
http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/L05/current/357/ which seems to be 
actually the reference one for the link you gave in the call [4]
I've used dct:type because in the RDF I got for this URI, the type was 
skos:Concept (which seems actually very right).
But when I look to the HTML doc I've been given in the call we attended, 
then I see the same URI is also defined as class:
http://schema.geolink.org/1.0/voc/nvs/L05.html#d4e3226
Should I change my example?

Thanks a lot for the help,

Antoine

[1] https://www.w3.org/2016/02/17-sdw-minutes
[2] 
https://github.com/w3c/dwbp/blob/08e1293039a7def3fe5f1dea38180f6e44db139f/bp.html
[3] @Editors, sorry for my merging my pull request myself: I had to get 
this public to send this mail!
[4] http://schema.geolink.org/1.0/voc/nvs/L05.html#d4e575

Received on Friday, 4 March 2016 21:46:44 UTC