Re: SOSA core - procedures vs devices from Joshua Lieberman on 2016-07-12 (public-sdw-wg@w3.org from July 2016)

From: Joshua Lieberman <jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 19:10:22 -0400
To: simon.cox@csiro.au
Cc: danh.lephuoc@tu-berlin.de, janowicz@ucsb.edu, armin.haller@anu.edu.au, public-sdw-wg@w3.org, kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au
Message-Id: <FE312605-C445-420B-8B62-597F45A7ED7B@tumblingwalls.com>

Sorry I missed the call today. So a device “runs” (l:n) a procedure in / during (1:n) a process?

—Josh

> On Jul 12, 2016, at 6:39 PM, simon.cox@csiro.au wrote:
> 
> I’ve put some notes and a diagram explaining my understanding of the consensus from today’s call here https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SOSA_Ontology#Procedures_vs_Devices <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/SOSA_Ontology#Procedures_vs_Devices> 
>  
> Note 
> 1.      I have adjusted the names of the classes to avoid ambiguity between the re-usable things and the events when they are used
> 2.      I have not yet implemented this in SOSA-Core – its just a proposal for now. 
> Simon

Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2016 23:11:06 UTC