Re: ACTION-85 Use Case

Hi Frans,

I'm sorry that I've missed this email.

What I tried to explain is this, currently the emergency response services 
only use GIS services available in their GIS Warehouse ( feel free to use 
standard terms ).
However during incidents there might be spatial data available at 3rd 
parties, this data could be in a external SDI or even in Web Data.
Currently there is no easy way to find the data and integrate the web 
based spatial data

The second part of the problem is that the spatial data which is presented 
does not contain any form of semantics as explained in my second 
submission.
So even if we would be able to find and use external data ( both GIS / Web 
) we have no clue what it exactly means.

Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
Bart van Leeuwen

##############################################################
# twitter: @semanticfire
# netage.nl
# http://netage.nl
# Esdoornstraat 3
# 3461ER Linschoten
# tel. +31(0)6-53182997
##############################################################



From:   Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
To:     Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>
Cc:     "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Date:   28-12-2015 14:46
Subject:        Re: ACTION-85 Use Case



Hello Bart,

In the process of trying to merge the two texts I came across something 
that seems inconsistent. In the existing use case it says "During 
emergency response operations in the Netherlands the only spatial data 
available to emergency response services are the predefined data in their 
GIS warehouses" and in the new text it says "During those incidents they 
[emergency response services] will use a wide variety of spatial data 
created and curated by third parties". 

Are the predefined data in the GIS warehouses of the emergency response 
services the same as spatial data created and curated by third parties? Or 
are they different data sources? I hope you can clarify this.

Greetings,
Frans




2015-12-26 13:46 GMT+01:00 Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>:
Hi Frans, 

Sounds good to me! 

Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
Bart van Leeuwen 

##############################################################
# twitter: @semanticfire 
# netage.nl
# http://netage.nl 
# M.A. Reinaldaweg 79 
# 3461AJ Linschoten
# tel. +31(0)6-53182997
############################################################## 



From:        Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> 
To:        Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl> 
Cc:        "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org> 
Date:        21-12-2015 12:10 
Subject:        Re: ACTION-85 Use Case 



Hello Bart, 

Shall I propose a merged text for the use case here in this thread?  

Regards, 
Frans 

2015-12-13 12:29 GMT+01:00 Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>: 
Hi Frans, 

Sorry, I seem to have missed this email completely. 

Having just one use case who covers it all is fine for me. 
How would you like to proceed on this ? 

Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
Bart van Leeuwen 

##############################################################
# twitter: @semanticfire 
# netage.nl
# http://netage.nl 
# M.A. Reinaldaweg 79 
# 3461AJ Linschoten
# tel. +31(0)6-53182997
############################################################## 



From:        Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> 
To:        Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>, Alejandro Llaves 
<allaves@fi.upm.es> 
Cc:        "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org> 
Date:        08-12-2015 13:55 
Subject:        Re: ACTION-85 Use Case 




Hello Bart, 

I realise this use case describes something not entirely covered by the 
existing emergency response use case, but do you think we could try to 
merge the new use case description with the use case already in the 
document? As far as I can tell, the related deliverable is Best Practices 
in both cases and requirements following from the use cases seem to be the 
same too. 

Regards, 
Frans 



2015-11-22 21:26 GMT+01:00 Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>: 
Hi all, 

As discussed on the call last week. 
ACTION-85 is about best practices on linking WxS with linked data, I 
created a use case to explain why this is important. 

Use Case. 

Emergency response services use SDI's to help manage large scale 
incidents. During those incidents they will use a wide variety of Spatial 
data created and currated by 3rd parties. Although the data provided by 
these 3rd parties is available through standard WxS services, these 
services lack the semantics of the thematic data. Currently there is no 
way for a WxS service to expose the semantics of the features it provides 
in a web of data way. 
If WxS services could be extended to provide the references to the 
semantic meaning of the features, the usabilty of these 3rd party services 
will greatly increase. 
By exposing the feature data as web data it should in the same time 
increase the discoverabilty of this data. 

Requirement: 

Link traditional WxS features to their web data counterparts 


Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
Bart van Leeuwen 

##############################################################
# twitter: @semanticfire 
# netage.nl
# http://netage.nl 
# M.A. Reinaldaweg 79 
# 3461AJ Linschoten
# tel. +31(0)6-53182997
##############################################################