- From: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:57:08 +0100
- To: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
- Cc: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
On 12/01/2016 22:18, Bill Roberts wrote: > > [snip] > > BP7, Possible approach to implementation > > "in some cases, geometry can be 95% of the total data size" - other > percentages may apply! Maybe - "often the geometric data is a large > percentage of the total data size" > > The choice of how to represent geometry might depend most on the tools > you expect your audience to have easy access to. Because different user > groups have different favourite tools, maybe good advice would be to > offer as many representations as you can - balancing that against the > cost of the additional storage or additional processing if converting > on-the-fly. I don't think binary formats are inherently less useful > than text formats in this regard - most people are going to need some > tooling to process geometry data, whatever choice you make. +1. And this can be related to the more general BP of making data available in different formats - which, in turns, relates to HTTP conneg. Cheers, Andrea
Received on Wednesday, 13 January 2016 07:57:56 UTC