suggested edits to bp doc

> BP eds,
> 
> Apologies for not using git for this --- I am in-between computers again.... I got a little way through a careful read of the bp doc. So far these are cosmetic rather than substantive suggestions. 
> ---
> Abstract: 
> 
> -change "provides best practices" to "advises on best practice"
> -"provide a significant change of emphasis" to "suggest a significant change of practice "
> 
> 
> s1.1 
> 
> -"Commercial operators, including search engines" to "Commercial operators, including search engine operators"
> 
> 
> 
> - "would be substantially aided" to "would be much better"
> 
> 
> - "data published in SDIs, " to "data published in  Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDIs)," --- I do think this needs to be spelled out in the text here, especially as it is used in the next heading. 
> 
> "spatial data infrastructure" -- leading caps for consistency
> 
> 
> "These standards have a steep learning curve." to "These technologies have a steep learning curve."
> 
> 
> "they are an important factor for " to "they are  important players in the business of" (must be a better word than players here, too, that escapes me)
> 
> 
> "Semantically meaningful" bothers me as it is way too close to a tautology. 
> 
> How about just "meaningful" alone?
> 
> 
> "([GeoJSON] being the prime example" suggest "the" should be "a", so to not be too dated nor unnecessarily controversial 
> 
> 
>  "Questions answered in this document include" suggest setting these out as dot points
> 
> 
> s2. 
> 
> "The introduction makes clear that" suggest delete- metalevel reference is unhelpful here.
> 
> 
> "second are better " s/are/is
> 
> 
> s2.1
> 
> "These are people already have" insert "who"
> 
> 
> s2.2
> "An aim of this document is to make it easy for non-experts to work with " I doubt they want to be classified as non-experts. Suggest (also keeps in style with previous paragraph) just removing this sentence. Also "CMS" needs a glossary entry. 
> 
> 
> s2.3 
> I can't distinguish this group from the first nor the second....
> 
> "in order for it to get used" -- suggest "so that it can be"
> 
> 
> s 3 
> 
> "applying thematic semantics to data." this migh require explanation to the intended audience!
> 
> 
> s6.1 
> 
> "a lighthouse standing somewhere at the coast is a" s/at/on
> 
> 
> BP1 (also BP3) later)
> "entity-level resources"  I don't understand what this means and it is not explained.  how about just "Entities" ?
> 
> 
> BP2 
> "prevents having an abundance of copies and much doubt regarding the authenticity of the information."   maybe "because it discourages proliferation of disconnected copies of uncertain provenance"?
> 
> Here we are using "Things" and SpatialThings" whereas before we talked about "Entities" . We have to be consistent.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>