W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > February 2016

RE: Proposed time slot for Best Practice sub-group teleconf - respond by Monday 29-Feb

From: Heaven, Rachel E. <reh@bgs.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:02:33 +0000
To: Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, Payam Barnaghi <p.barnaghi@surrey.ac.uk>, "SDW WG Public List" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DB3PR06MB0634D3CE7BD3677DAC458D0BEFBA0@DB3PR06MB0634.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Jeremy

Wed 15:00 utc occasionally
Wed 20:00 utc rarely

But I’ll follow all the minutes and happy to do work offline...

Rachel


From: Jeremy Tandy [mailto:jeremy.tandy@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 February 2016 09:33
To: Linda van den Brink; Payam Barnaghi; SDW WG Public List
Subject: Proposed time slot for Best Practice sub-group teleconf - respond by Monday 29-Feb

Hi.

At last night's weekly teleconf (minutes [1]), we agreed to set up sub-group meetings for best practices, time, ssn and coverage deliverables.

Sub-groups will meet EVERY OTHER WEEK, starting w/c 7-Mar.

(Unfortunately I will miss the meeting this week due to work travel- but Linda will definitely be available for the BP sub-group meeting ... kindly asking Ed to help chair the first meeting whilst we get used to the webex/irc stuff!)

For BEST PRACTICES, we propose:

EITHER: Wednesday @ 15:00utc
OR: Wednesday @ 20:00utc (this is the 'normal slot we've been using for the full group meeting).

So the first meeting for BP sub-group would then be 9-Mar.

We've gone for euro/US 'friendly' times given those of you on the call last night who indicated that you want to participate:

[20:18] <kerry> who want to be here for BP meetings?
[20:18] <jtandy> +1
[20:18] <eparsons> +1
[20:18] <AndreaPerego> +1
[20:18] <billroberts> +1
[20:18] <Linda> +1
[20:18] <ScottSimmons> +1
[20:18] <MattPerry> +1
[20:18] <LarsG> +1
[20:18] <ClausStadler> +1
[20:18] <ChrisLittle> +0
[20:19] <robin> +1

If neither of these suggestions are suitable, then please make some suggestions- albeit we might not be able to accommodate them.

Answers by end Monday 29-Feb please!

Best regards, Jeremy

[1]: https://www.w3.org/2016/02/24-sdw-minutes

________________________________
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
________________________________
Received on Monday, 29 February 2016 10:03:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:20 UTC