Re: Time slot for coverage sub-group phone calls

thanks Scott - I think that probably rules out the UK morning slot then (I
feared that might be the case!) and to accommodate both US and Australia
without extreme sleep deprivation we'll probably need to go for 2000 (ish)
UTC.

On 25 February 2016 at 15:23, Scott Simmons <ssimmons@opengeospatial.org>
wrote:

> Bill,
>
> I am in Mountain (UTC -7), as should be Robin since he is working with
> Univ, of Calgary. So 0800 UTC would be tough for most attendance. However,
> I will flex with the majority decision!!!!!
>
> Scott
>
> > On Feb 25, 2016, at 7:56 AM, Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > As discussed at the meeting last night, we want to find a time for
> regular calls on the coverage work strand.  The first one will be w/c 7
> March and the calls will be every other week.
> >
> > The people who expressed an interest last night (apart from me) were:
> > Scott
> > Jeremy
> > Ed
> > Chris
> > Robin
> > Kerry
> > Raul
> >
> > Jon Blower wasn't on the call but I hope he would like to take part! so
> have cc'd him separately on this mail.
> >
> > I've also cc'd Manolis Koubarakis and Jitao Yang who I understand are my
> co-editors of the coverage deliverable.
> >
> > Since the BP group looks like it is voting in favour of Wednesday 1500
> UTC, I'd like to propose these two options:
> >
> > 1) Wednesday at 2000UTC (same as plenary calls but on intermediate
> weeks).
> > 2) Thursday at 0800UTC (early morning in Europe, afternoon China, early
> evening in Australia, middle of the night in US - Robin and Scott, I'm not
> sure of your home time zones!)
> > 3) Tuesday at 2000UTC
> >
> > Please cast your votes
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>