RE: Glossary/Definitions - RE: [Minutes] 2016-02-09 F2F Day 2

... because they don't have the skills, or resources. They focus more on the content than delivery. But the content does reflect the outcome of a pretty rigorous process.

I have a student looking at it, as of yesterday, but not sure how fast that will move.

Simon J D Cox

Research Scientist

Environmental Information Infrastructures

Land and Water

CSIRO



E simon.cox@csiro.au T +61 3 9545 2365 M +61 403 302 672

   Physical: Reception Central, Bayview Avenue, Clayton, Vic 3168

   Deliveries: Gate 3, Normanby Road, Clayton, Vic 3168

   Postal: Private Bag 10, Clayton South, Vic 3169

people.csiro.au/Simon-Cox

orcid.org/0000-0002-3884-3420

researchgate.net/profile/Simon_Cox3




________________________________
From: Kerry Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2016 11:22:01 PM
To: Phil Archer; Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton); public-sdw-wg@w3.org; Linda van den Brink
Subject: RE: Glossary/Definitions - RE: [Minutes] 2016-02-09 F2F Day 2

Phil,
Why would TC211 not do it themselves?  Why us?
Although I cannot see it being very difficult.

Kerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org]
Sent: Thursday, 11 February 2016 6:51 AM
To: Simon.Cox@csiro.au; public-sdw-wg@w3.org; Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
Subject: Re: Glossary/Definitions - RE: [Minutes] 2016-02-09 F2F Day 2

+ Linda

Simon,

Geonovum's Paul Janssen approached me this evening to talk about this very topic. I ended up saying that *if* this WG so desired, we could go through some cycles of liaison with TC211 to make sure everyone was happy and, if so, publish their glossary as a SKOS concept scheme in w3.org space (full credit, their doc is normative, all mistakes are ours yada yada). (All good concept schemes come with human readable HTML versions of course).

WDYT?

Phil.

On 09/02/2016 23:25, Simon.Cox@csiro.au wrote:
>>        [42] https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Glossary_of_terms
>
> The ISO/TC 211 Glossary is also publicly available.
> http://www.isotc211.org/Terminology.htm
> Why not just use that?
> It is currently a spreadsheet, but it has been suggested to convert into linked data resources.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2016 1:57 AM
> To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: [Minutes] 2016-02-09 F2F Day 2
>
> Minutes from today's F2F meeting are, of course, at
> https://www.w3.org/2016/02/09-sdw-minutes.
>
> The text version is pasted below.
>

--


Phil Archer
W3C Data Activity Lead
http://www.w3.org/2013/data/

http://philarcher.org
+44 (0)7887 767755
@philarcher1