- From: Little, Chris <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 16:39:48 +0000
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, "sdwwg@lists.opengeospatial.org" <sdwwg@lists.opengeospatial.org>
Dear All, Here is an issue in the latest draft of the Time Ontology http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/ for discussion and resolution. Well, I do not really understand this just now. Datatypes have been updated in OWL-Time. The question for me is what is the real use case based requirement? Do we meet them by loosening the rdfs:domain definition, or having a TimeZone stub? Chris ---------------- 5.4 Class: DateTimeInterval Issue 7 [No link] Verify that this satisfies the SDWWG requirement 5.53 Update datatypes in OWL Time ---------------- Chris Little Co-Chair, OGC Meteorology & Oceanography Domain Working Group IT Fellow - Operational Infrastructures Met Office FitzRoy Road Exeter Devon EX1 3PB United Kingdom Tel: +44(0)1392 886278 Fax: +44(0)1392 885681 Mobile: +44(0)7753 880514 E-mail: chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk http://www.metoffice.gov.uk I am normally at work Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday each week
Received on Friday, 16 December 2016 16:40:21 UTC