- From: Little, Chris <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 15:04:35 +0000
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, "sdwwg@lists.opengeospatial.org" <sdwwg@lists.opengeospatial.org>
Dear All, Here is an issue in the latest draft of the Time Ontology http://w3c.github.io/sdw/time/ for discussion and resolution. I propose to delete this issue because if the existing OWL-Time can or cannot support "past, present and future", the revised ontology will be the same. In effect this is looking for evidence of implementation, or none. I think that the original requirement from the use cases was about being able to reason about relative times. E.g. an event is in the past but was in the future of a previous event at that time. That is, reasoning about several events and their sequence, from the 'viewpoint' of each of them. If anyone has evidence of such usage by OWL-Time, we can point from the requirement to Ontology, as proposed for several of the Notes. Chris ---------------- Section 2 Changes from previous versions Issue 4 https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/15 Past, present future - this appears to already be supported using capabilities in OWL-Time, but needs to be verified. ---------------- Chris Little Co-Chair, OGC Meteorology & Oceanography Domain Working Group IT Fellow - Operational Infrastructures Met Office FitzRoy Road Exeter Devon EX1 3PB United Kingdom Tel: +44(0)1392 886278 Fax: +44(0)1392 885681 Mobile: +44(0)7753 880514 E-mail: chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk http://www.metoffice.gov.uk I am normally at work Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday each week
Received on Friday, 16 December 2016 15:05:11 UTC