Re: BP editors draft ready for review

Dear BP editors,

Many thanks for this work! Unfortunately, I haven't managed to be at the 
f2f, but I'll try as much as possible to participate remotely to the BP 
sessions. In any case, I send in advance my +1 for the publication of 
the new version of the BP.

Meanwhile, I include below a quick comment that may be considered for 
future releases of the BP document.

In BP4, about the "Why", I was thinking it may be worth making more 
explicit the second part of point #1 ("people may not even be aware of 
their existence"), maybe moving it in a specific point - e.g.:

"to find the relevant data, you need to know in advance in which 
catalogs they are registered"

Meet you tomorrow

Andrea


On 13/12/2016 21:09, Linda van den Brink wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The BP editors draft[1] is ready to be reviewed. As you know we've
> planned a vote to release a new WD, this Friday.
>
> You should re-read BP4, 6, 7 and 11. These have been significantly updated.
>
> Minor changes include the addition to section 9 of a list of most
> important BPs when starting from an existing SDI, change of a few BP
> titles to include the word spatial
>
> For all changes since the last WD see [2] (changes after October are new).
>
> [1]: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/bp/
>
> [2]: https://github.com/w3c/sdw/commits/gh-pages/bp
>
> Linda
>

-- 
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
Unit B6 - Digital Economy
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/

----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.

Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2016 15:47:34 UTC